BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11867084)

  • 21. A theoretical analysis of gene selection.
    Mukherjee S; Roberts SJ
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():131-41. PubMed ID: 16448007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes.
    Lai Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Jun; 30(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 16650806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of differential gene expression algorithms: application comparing fold-change estimation to hypothesis testing.
    Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():63. PubMed ID: 20109217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simulation-based approach for evaluating microarray analyses.
    Blades NJ; Grimshaw SD; Pendleton CR
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 20181614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A global approach to identify differentially expressed genes in cDNA (two-color) microarray experiments.
    Zhou Y; Cras-Méneur C; Ohsugi M; Stormo GD; Permutt MA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(16):2073-9. PubMed ID: 17550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Covariance thresholding to detect differentially co-expressed genes from microarray gene expression data.
    Oh M; Kim K; Sun H
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):2050002. PubMed ID: 32336254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Segmentation of cDNA microarray spots using markov random field modeling.
    Demirkaya O; Asyali MH; Shoukri MM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):2994-3000. PubMed ID: 15840703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Computational Approach Using Ratio Statistics for Identifying Housekeeping Genes from cDNA Microarray Data.
    Sengupta T; Bhushan M; Wangikar PP
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(6):1457-63. PubMed ID: 26671815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chaotic genetic algorithm for gene selection and classification problems.
    Chuang LY; Yang CS; Li JC; Yang CH
    OMICS; 2009 Oct; 13(5):407-20. PubMed ID: 19594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Model-based clustering of microarray expression data via latent Gaussian mixture models.
    McNicholas PD; Murphy TB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(21):2705-12. PubMed ID: 20802251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multivariate search for differentially expressed gene combinations.
    Xiao Y; Frisina R; Gordon A; Klebanov L; Yakovlev A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():164. PubMed ID: 15507138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A non-transformation method for identifying differentially expressed genes from cDNA microarrays.
    Zhang JG; Yin ZJ; Zhang Q
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Jan; 33(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 16450591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robust complementary hierarchical clustering for gene expression data analysis by β-divergence.
    Badsha MB; Mollah MN; Jahan N; Kurata H
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2013 Sep; 116(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 23608734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel Mixture Model Method for identification of differentially expressed genes from DNA microarray data.
    Najarian K; Zaheri M; Rad AA; Najarian S; Dargahi J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():201. PubMed ID: 15603585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria.
    Chen JJ; Tsai CA; Tzeng S; Chen CH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():74. PubMed ID: 17338815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microarray-based gene set analysis: a comparison of current methods.
    Song S; Black MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():502. PubMed ID: 19038052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates.
    Chen DT; Chen JJ; Soong SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2861-6. PubMed ID: 15814562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise factor analysis for cDNA microarrays.
    Balagurunathan Y; Wang N; Dougherty ER; Nguyen D; Chen Y; Bittner ML; Trent J; Carroll R
    J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(4):663-78. PubMed ID: 15250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.