These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868191)

  • 41. Rapid and slow brain systems of abstract and concrete words differentiation.
    Sysoeva OV; Ilyuchenok IR; Ivanitsky AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):272-83. PubMed ID: 17582633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: when more TOTs means better retrieval.
    Gollan TH; Brown AS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):462-83. PubMed ID: 16846276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contrast of hand preferences between communicative gestures and non-communicative actions in baboons: implications for the origins of hemispheric specialization for language.
    Meguerditchian A; Vauclair J
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 19091390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Beat gestures improve word recall in 3- to 5-year-old children.
    Igualada A; Esteve-Gibert N; Prieto P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Apr; 156():99-112. PubMed ID: 28061372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures.
    Holle H; Gunter TC; Rüschemeyer SA; Hennenlotter A; Iacoboni M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2010-24. PubMed ID: 18093845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of prohibiting gestures on children's lexical retrieval ability.
    Pine KJ; Bird H; Kirk E
    Dev Sci; 2007 Nov; 10(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 17973791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus).
    Giret N; Miklósi A; Kreutzer M; Bovet D
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18543008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease.
    Balota DA; Duchek JM; Sergent-Marshall SD; Roediger HL
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Mar; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 16594788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Meaningful gestures: electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension.
    Wu YC; Coulson S
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):654-67. PubMed ID: 16364061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Levels of processing with free and cued recall and unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Lespinet-Najib V; N'Kaoua B; Sauzéon H; Bresson C; Rougier A; Claverie B
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15010240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A female advantage in the serial production of non-representational learned gestures.
    Chipman K; Hampson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2315-29. PubMed ID: 16780902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of recall, reproduction, and restudy on word learning: a pre-registered study.
    Krishnan S; Watkins KE; Bishop DVM
    BMC Psychol; 2017 Aug; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 28778213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults.
    Marsh EJ; Dolan PO; Balota DA; Roediger HL
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 15065937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Single-letter retrieval cues for anagram solution.
    Witte KL; Freund JS
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jul; 128(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 11678360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias.
    Otani H; Whiteman HL
    Am J Psychol; 1994; 107(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 7977903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.