These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868441)
1. A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals. Shea B; Moher D; Graham I; Pham B; Tugwell P Eval Health Prof; 2002 Mar; 25(1):116-29. PubMed ID: 11868441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Jones A; Klassen TP; Tugwell P; Moher M; Moher D JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 9676681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology. Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P; J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():68-89. PubMed ID: 26348799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):W65-94. PubMed ID: 19622512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):e1-34. PubMed ID: 19631507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China]. Hou ZK; Li JS; Yu XQ; Li B; Zhou HY; Zhang YX Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 21(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 19374786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2700. PubMed ID: 19622552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals]. Liu JP; Xia Y Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Mulrow C; Gøtzsche PC; Ioannidis JP; Clarke M; Devereaux PJ; Kleijnen J; Moher D PLoS Med; 2009 Jul; 6(7):e1000100. PubMed ID: 19621070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study. Biondi-Zoccai GG; Lotrionte M; Abbate A; Testa L; Remigi E; Burzotta F; Valgimigli M; Romagnoli E; Crea F; Agostoni P BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7535):202-9. PubMed ID: 16415336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews. Al Faleh K; Al-Omran M BMC Pediatr; 2009 Jun; 9():38. PubMed ID: 19534780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor. Mullan RJ; Flynn DN; Carlberg B; Tleyjeh IM; Kamath CC; LaBella ML; Erwin PJ; Guyatt GH; Montori VM J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 19013767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine. Junhua Z; Hongcai S; Xiumei G; Boli Z; Yaozu X; Hongbo C; Ming R J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):797-805. PubMed ID: 17983335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis for reporting quality of Chinese meta-analysis on stomatology]. Li CJ; Lü J; Su NC; Li S; Shi ZD Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 May; 46(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 21733375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]