These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868571)

  • 1. Pemberton v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Center.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1999; 66():1247-57. PubMed ID: 11868571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
    Finamore EP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Terminal care and the pregnant woman: ethical reflections on In Re: A.C.
    Tuohey JF
    Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1268-73. PubMed ID: 1956747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. She's going to die: the case of Angela C.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 3350646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Re A.C., 16 June 1987.
    United States. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():110. PubMed ID: 12346599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lives at stake. How to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
    Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(7):18-27. PubMed ID: 10120198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: a study of obstetricians' attitudes in Europe.
    Cuttini M; Habiba M; Nilstun T; Donfrancesco S; Garel M; Arnaud C; Bleker O; Da Frè M; Gomez MM; Heyl W; Marsal K; Saracci R;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1121-9. PubMed ID: 17077233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Woman can challenge hospital over forced caesarean.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7100):78. PubMed ID: 11644954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply to Sarah Burns.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent?
    Lyng K; Syse A; Børdahl PE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jan; 84(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 15603565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caesarean Section Refusal in the Irish Courts: Health Service Executive v B.
    Wade K
    Med Law Rev; 2017 Aug; 25(3):494-504. PubMed ID: 28830115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
    Florida
    Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The patient, the doctor, the fetus, and the court-compelled Cesarean: why courts should address the question through a bioethical lens.
    Chandis V; Williams T
    Med Law; 2006 Dec; 25(4):729-46. PubMed ID: 17263038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The maternal-fetal conflict: the right of a woman to refuse a Cesarean section versus the state's interest in saving the life of the fetus.
    Levy DR
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2007 May; (337):9-36. PubMed ID: 17694896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.