These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868616)

  • 1. Beyond pretrial publicity: legal and ethical issues associated with change of venue surveys.
    Posey AJ; Dahl LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):107-25. PubMed ID: 11868616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing pretrial publicity effects: integrating content analytic results.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Pathak-Sharma MK; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 10846375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Afterword: the past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research.
    Fulero SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 11868617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Penrod SD; Pathak-Sharma MK; Groscup JL; Devenport JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):19-41. PubMed ID: 11868618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case studies of pre- and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation.
    Vidmar N
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):73-105. PubMed ID: 11868621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Penrod SD; O'Connor M; Wallace B
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):462-77. PubMed ID: 24933173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pretrial publicity and civil cases: a two-way street?
    Bornstein BH; Whisenhunt BL; Nemeth RJ; Dunaway DL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11868619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
    Ragatz LL; Russell B
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. N.C. Supreme Court upholds exclusion of HIV in jury selection.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Sep; 10(16):3-4. PubMed ID: 11362769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The court for sexual offences: perceptions of the perpetrators of sexual offences.
    Walker SP; Louw DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 16546256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for different crimes.
    Bergeron CE; McKelvie SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 14760966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From Research Conclusions to Real Change: Understanding the First Amendment's (Non)Response to the Negative Effects of Media on Children by Looking to the Example of Violent Video Game Regulations.
    Knake RN
    SMU Law Rev; 2010; 63(4):1197-1236. PubMed ID: 30027726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary: Pursuing justice in death penalty trials.
    Watson C; Eth S; Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22396341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.