These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868618)

  • 1. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Penrod SD; Pathak-Sharma MK; Groscup JL; Devenport JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):19-41. PubMed ID: 11868618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Penrod SD; O'Connor M; Wallace B
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):462-77. PubMed ID: 24933173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pretrial publicity and civil cases: a two-way street?
    Bornstein BH; Whisenhunt BL; Nemeth RJ; Dunaway DL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11868619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond pretrial publicity: legal and ethical issues associated with change of venue surveys.
    Posey AJ; Dahl LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):107-25. PubMed ID: 11868616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing pretrial publicity effects: integrating content analytic results.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Pathak-Sharma MK; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 10846375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Afterword: the past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research.
    Fulero SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 11868617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors.
    Hope L; Memon A; McGeorge P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15222805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case studies of pre- and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation.
    Vidmar N
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):73-105. PubMed ID: 11868621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for different crimes.
    Bergeron CE; McKelvie SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 144(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 14760966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criminal profiling: is there a role for the forensic psychiatrist?
    McGrath MG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 11055529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jury panel member perceptions of interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy predict support for execution in a capital murder trial simulation.
    Cox J; Clark JC; Edens JF; Smith ST; Magyar MS
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):411-28. PubMed ID: 23754472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.