These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity. Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Penrod SD; Pathak-Sharma MK; Groscup JL; Devenport JL Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):19-41. PubMed ID: 11868618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability. Daftary-Kapur T; Penrod SD; O'Connor M; Wallace B Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):462-77. PubMed ID: 24933173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Case studies of pre- and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation. Vidmar N Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):73-105. PubMed ID: 11868621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making. Ruva CL; McEvoy C J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond pretrial publicity: legal and ethical issues associated with change of venue surveys. Posey AJ; Dahl LM Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):107-25. PubMed ID: 11868616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis. Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CAM, free speech, and the British legal system: overstepping the mark? Milgrom LR J Altern Complement Med; 2009 Oct; 15(10):1135-8. PubMed ID: 19848549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making. Robbennolt JK; Studebaker CA Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 12647465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No liability found for individual defendants in HIV case. AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):5. PubMed ID: 11365108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defamation--defences--fair protected report of court proceedings. Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd. Gulam H J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 15575318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial. Riedel RG Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]