These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11868619)

  • 1. Pretrial publicity and civil cases: a two-way street?
    Bornstein BH; Whisenhunt BL; Nemeth RJ; Dunaway DL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11868619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing pretrial publicity effects: integrating content analytic results.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Pathak-Sharma MK; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 10846375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity.
    Studebaker CA; Robbennolt JK; Penrod SD; Pathak-Sharma MK; Groscup JL; Devenport JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):19-41. PubMed ID: 11868618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Penrod SD; O'Connor M; Wallace B
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):462-77. PubMed ID: 24933173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case studies of pre- and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation.
    Vidmar N
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):73-105. PubMed ID: 11868621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond pretrial publicity: legal and ethical issues associated with change of venue surveys.
    Posey AJ; Dahl LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):107-25. PubMed ID: 11868616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CAM, free speech, and the British legal system: overstepping the mark?
    Milgrom LR
    J Altern Complement Med; 2009 Oct; 15(10):1135-8. PubMed ID: 19848549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. News media reporting on civil litigation and its influence on civil justice decision making.
    Robbennolt JK; Studebaker CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 12647465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No liability found for individual defendants in HIV case.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):5. PubMed ID: 11365108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defamation--defences--fair protected report of court proceedings. Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd.
    Gulam H
    J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 15575318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.
    Daniels AH; Ruttiman R; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Brea BA; Palumbo MA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 28731391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors.
    Hope L; Memon A; McGeorge P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15222805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organizational downsizing and age discrimination litigation: the influence of personnel practices and statistical evidence on litigation outcomes.
    Wingate PH; Thornton GC; McIntyre KS; Frame JH
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):87-108. PubMed ID: 12647469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Juror competence in civil trials: effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality.
    ForsterLee L; Horowitz IA; Bourgeois MJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1993 Feb; 78(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 8449852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.