These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11869693)

  • 1. Shouldn't cost be considered a significant issue in medical care?
    Holden JL
    Am J Surg; 2002 Jan; 183(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 11869693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Day-care for breast cancer: ambulatory surgery and intra-operative radiation. Techniques and preliminary results of the Centre Val-d'Aurelle--Montpellier.
    Mourregot A; Lemanski C; Gutowski M; Colombo PE; Charissoux M; Dubois JB; Azria D; Saint-Aubert B; Domergue J; Mathieu-Daude H; Rouanet P
    J Visc Surg; 2014 Apr; 151 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 24629688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appropriate payment will follow quality care.
    Mabry CD
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1027-9. PubMed ID: 15545501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The economic impact of technical change in the local treatment of breast cancer.
    Kurdas C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 9119618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of breast conservation surgery compared with modified radical mastectomy with and without reconstruction.
    Palit TK; Miltenburg DM; Brunicardi FC
    Am J Surg; 2000 Jun; 179(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 11004327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
    Barlow WE; Taplin SH; Yoshida CK; Buist DS; Seger D; Brown M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 11259470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-step surgery for breast cancer: back to the future?
    Cody HS
    World J Surg; 2007 Jun; 31(6):1153-4. PubMed ID: 17440773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost/accuracy ratio analysis in breast cancer patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, sentinel node biopsy, and frozen section of node.
    Genta F; Zanon E; Camanni M; Deltetto F; Drogo M; Gallo R; Gilardi C
    World J Surg; 2007 Jun; 31(6):1155-63. PubMed ID: 17464539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational and cost analysis of the implementation of breast cancer sentinel node intraoperative molecular diagnosis.
    Cutress RI; McDowell A; Gabriel FG; Gill J; Jeffrey MJ; Agrawal A; Wise M; Raftery J; Cree IA; Yiangou C
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):522-9. PubMed ID: 20439323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic implications of ACOSOG Z0011 trial application into clinical practice at the European Institute of Oncology.
    Mattar D; Di Filippo A; Invento A; Radice D; Burcuta M; Bagnardi V; Magnoni F; Santomauro G; Corso G; Mazzarol G; Viale G; Sacchini V; Galimberti V; Veronesi P; Intra M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 47(10):2499-2505. PubMed ID: 34172359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost/Accuracy ratio analysis in breast cancer patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, sentinel node biopsy, and frozen section of node.
    Tan MP
    World J Surg; 2008 Jan; 32(1):125-6; author reply 127. PubMed ID: 17952704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Present status and future perspective of surgical therapy for breast neoplasms].
    Ikeda T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():434-8. PubMed ID: 17682189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal based perforator free flaps.
    Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT; Lee BT; Nahabedian MY
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):448-449. PubMed ID: 28591935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using cost-effectiveness analysis to define a breast cancer benefits package for the uninsured.
    Malin JL; Keeler E; Wang C; Brook R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Jul; 74(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 12186375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simplification of breast cancer surgery.
    Cady B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15827770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiotherapy of breast carcinoma. 2005 version].
    Organgruppe "Mammakarzinom" der DEGRO
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Feb; 182 Suppl 1():4-28. PubMed ID: 16613299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS?
    Cox CE; Nguyen K; Gray RJ; Salud C; Ku NN; Dupont E; Hutson L; Peltz E; Whitehead G; Reintgen D; Cantor A
    Am Surg; 2001 Jun; 67(6):513-9; discussion 519-21. PubMed ID: 11409797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should improved mastectomy and reconstruction alter the primary management of breast cancer?
    Jensen JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Apr; 103(4):1308-10. PubMed ID: 10088524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical management of breast cancer.
    LaCross JS
    JAAPA; 2015 Jun; 28(6):47-8, 50-2, 54-5. PubMed ID: 25989435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early adoption and disturbing disparities in sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.
    Edge SB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):449-50. PubMed ID: 18364503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.