408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11869786)
1. Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis: a review of laboratory methods for detection of these waterborne parasites.
Quintero-Betancourt W; Peele ER; Rose JB
J Microbiol Methods; 2002 May; 49(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 11869786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of Molecular Diagnosis Using Multiplex Real-Time PCR and T4 Phage Internal Control to Simultaneously Detect Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, and Cyclospora cayetanensis from Human Stool Samples.
Shin JH; Lee SE; Kim TS; Ma DW; Cho SH; Chai JY; Shin EH
Korean J Parasitol; 2018 Oct; 56(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 30419727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An immunomagnetic separation-real-time PCR method for quantification of Cryptosporidium parvum in water samples.
Fontaine M; Guillot E
J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Jul; 54(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12732419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiplex-Touchdown PCR to Simultaneously Detect
Shin JH; Lee SE; Kim TS; Ma DW; Chai JY; Shin EH
Korean J Parasitol; 2016 Oct; 54(5):631-636. PubMed ID: 27853120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concentrating Toxoplasma gondii and Cyclospora cayetanensis from surface water and drinking water by continuous separation channel centrifugation.
Borchardt MA; Spencer SK; Bertz PD; Ware MW; Dubey JP; Alan Lindquist HD
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 107(4):1089-97. PubMed ID: 19486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dead-End Ultrafiltration and DNA-Based Methods for Detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Agricultural Water.
Durigan M; Murphy HR; da Silva AJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Nov; 86(23):. PubMed ID: 32948525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biology, persistence and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocyst.
Carey CM; Lee H; Trevors JT
Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(4):818-62. PubMed ID: 14769405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of human pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Cryptosporidium parvum on the surfaces of vegetables and fruits in Henan, China.
Li J; Shi K; Sun F; Li T; Wang R; Zhang S; Jian F; Ning C; Zhang L
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Oct; 307():108292. PubMed ID: 31430663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of wash solutions in recovering Cyclospora cayetanensis, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Toxoplasma gondii from basil.
Chandra V; Torres M; Ortega YR
J Food Prot; 2014 Aug; 77(8):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25198596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An immunomagnetic separation-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (IMS-RT-PCR) test for sensitive and rapid detection of viable waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.
Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 5(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 12823191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confirmed detection of Cyclospora cayetanesis, Encephalitozoon intestinalis and Cryptosporidium parvum in water used for drinking.
Dowd SE; John D; Eliopolus J; Gerba CP; Naranjo J; Klein R; López B; de Mejía M; Mendoza CE; Pepper IL
J Water Health; 2003 Sep; 1(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 15384722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Co-infection with Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis in immunocompromised patients.
Helmy MM; Rashed LA; Abdel-Fattah HS
J Egypt Soc Parasitol; 2006 Aug; 36(2):613-27. PubMed ID: 16927872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of three commercial DNA extraction kits and a laboratory-developed method for detecting Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora in raspberry wash, basil wash and pesto.
Shields JM; Joo J; Kim R; Murphy HR
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Jan; 92(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 23147278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assay combining cell culture with reverse transcriptase PCR to detect and determine the infectivity of waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.
Rochelle PA; Ferguson DM; Handojo TJ; De Leon R; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 May; 63(5):2029-37. PubMed ID: 9143132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous Molecular Detection of
Sim S; Won J; Kim JW; Kim K; Park WY; Yu JR
Korean J Parasitol; 2017 Apr; 55(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 28506035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of UNEX-based DNA extraction for molecular detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis, Toxoplasma gondii, and Cryptosporidium parvum as contaminants of berries.
Temesgen TT; Barlaam A; Tysnes KR; Robertson LJ
Food Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 89():103447. PubMed ID: 32138995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Highly sensitive and specific PCR assay for reliable detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis oocysts.
Lalonde LF; Gajadhar AA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 74(14):4354-8. PubMed ID: 18502915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field-deployable and near-real-time optical microfluidic biosensors for single-oocyst-level detection of Cryptosporidium parvum from field water samples.
Angus SV; Kwon HJ; Yoon JY
J Environ Monit; 2012 Dec; 14(12):3295-304. PubMed ID: 23152174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An immunomagnetic separation polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid and ultra-sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in drinking water.
Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1999 Jul; 176(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10427711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a common laboratory glassware detergent improves recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis from lettuce, herbs and raspberries.
Shields JM; Lee MM; Murphy HR
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 153(1-2):123-8. PubMed ID: 22094179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
