These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 118706)

  • 21. A turbidimetric study of the responses of selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to eight antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Greenwood D; Eley A
    J Infect Dis; 1982 Jan; 145(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 6459389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inability of carbenicillin to predict ticarcillin activity versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa by disc-agar diffusion.
    Flournoy DJ
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982; 4(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 6811811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combination of ceftizoxime with azlocillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin and ticarcillin.
    Neu HC
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Nov; 10 Suppl C():63-8. PubMed ID: 6296031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative in vitro activity of ticarcillin, piperacillin, azlocillin and mezlocillin.
    Chattopadhyay B; Hall I; Curnow SR
    Curr Med Res Opin; 1983; 8(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 6653135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Proposed ticarcillin disk control values for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: multicenter cooperative study.
    Prior RB; Fass RJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Sep; 14(3):507-8. PubMed ID: 101134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro activity of mezlocillin and azlocillin compared with that of four other penicillins and two aminoglycosides.
    Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Jones RN; Gavan TL
    Cleve Clin Q; 1980; 47(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 6451334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative activity of cefsulodin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae (author's transl)].
    Courtieu AL; Drugeon HB; Bryskier A; Chung SS; Reynaud A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6):432-9. PubMed ID: 6810287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of ticarcillin and carbenicillin activity against random and select populations Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Prior RB; Fass RJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Feb; 13(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 417671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of in vitro bacteriostatic effect of five betalactamins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (author's transl)].
    Lesage D; Delisle-Mizon F; Denis C; Vergez P; Daguet GL
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1982 Jun; 30(6):440-3. PubMed ID: 6213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The comparative synergistic activity of amikacin, gentamicin, netilmicin and azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin against Serratia marcescens.
    Fu KP; Neu HC
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Feb; 31(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 344298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cefsulodin: antibacterial activity and tentative interpretive zone standards for the disk susceptibility test.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Oct; 20(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 6211134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Activity of azlocillin and mezlocillin against gram-negative organisms: comparison with other penicillins.
    Wise R; Gillett AP; Andrews JM; Bedford KA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Apr; 13(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 96726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Piperacillin (T-1220), a new semisynthetic penicillin: in vitro antimicrobial activity comparison with carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin.
    Jones RN; Thornsberry C; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 30(12):1107-14. PubMed ID: 599084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [In vitro examination of some new penicillin derivatives with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: azlocillin, mezlocillin and piperacillin compared with carbenicillin].
    Høiby N; Bremmelgaard A; Schouenborg P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1979 Oct; 141(41):2815-8. PubMed ID: 120049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Pseudomonas aeruginosa: acquired in vitro resistance to beta-lactams].
    Thabaut A; Meyran M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1983 May; 31(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 6413939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ticarcillin: a collaborative in vitro comparison with carbenicillin against over 9,000 clinical bacterial isolates.
    Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Jones RN; Barry AL; Thornsberry C
    Am J Med Sci; 1977; 274(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 610415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the activities of the new ureidopenicillins piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, and Bay k 4999 against gram-negative organisms.
    Verbist L
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Aug; 16(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 485123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of ureidopenicillins for selection of plasmid vector transformants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida.
    Day DL; Yasinow D; McDonough J; Shuster CW
    J Bacteriol; 1984 Mar; 157(3):937-9. PubMed ID: 6321446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79.
    King JD; Farmer T; Reading C; Sutherland R
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Mar; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6769973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of seven semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic gram-negative bacteria and enterococci.
    Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
    Infection; 1982; 10 Suppl 3():S249-56. PubMed ID: 7152690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.