BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11870819)

  • 1. Bayesian estimation of the proportion of treatment effect captured by a surrogate marker.
    Cowles MK
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):811-34. PubMed ID: 11870819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of a measure of the proportion of the treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.
    Bycott PW; Taylor JM
    Control Clin Trials; 1998 Dec; 19(6):555-68. PubMed ID: 9875835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and analysis of Bayesian adaptive crossover trials for evaluating contact lens safety and efficacy.
    Zhang Q; Toubouti Y; Carlin BP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1216-1236. PubMed ID: 25698715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogate markers and joint models for longitudinal and survival data.
    Taylor JM; Wang Y
    Control Clin Trials; 2002 Dec; 23(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 12505241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian inference for a nonlinear mixed-effects Tobit model with multivariate skew-t distributions: application to AIDS studies.
    Dagne G; Huang Y
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Sep; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22992288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CD4 cell count as a surrogate endpoint in HIV clinical trials: a meta-analysis of studies of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.
    Hughes MD; Daniels MJ; Fischl MA; Kim S; Schooley RT
    AIDS; 1998 Oct; 12(14):1823-32. PubMed ID: 9792383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
    Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian adjusted R2 for the meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate time-to-event endpoints in clinical trials.
    Renfro LA; Shi Q; Sargent DJ; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):743-61. PubMed ID: 22161275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Bayesian expected power via Bayesian bootstrap.
    Liu F
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3471-3485. PubMed ID: 29938832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing Monte Carlo error in the Bayesian estimation of risk ratios using log-binomial regression models.
    Salmerón D; Cano JA; Chirlaque MD
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2755-67. PubMed ID: 25944082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.
    Alfaro ME; Zoller S; Lutzoni F
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 12598693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new proportion measure of the treatment effect captured by candidate surrogate endpoints.
    Kobayashi F; Kuroki M
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3338-53. PubMed ID: 24782344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
    Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian noninferiority test for 2 binomial probabilities as the extension of Fisher exact test.
    Doi M; Takahashi F; Kawasaki Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4789-4803. PubMed ID: 28960376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating surrogate markers of clinical outcome when measured with error.
    Dafni UG; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1445-62. PubMed ID: 9883544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness considerations in Bayesian analysis.
    Gustafson P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Dec; 5(4):357-73. PubMed ID: 9004378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian approach to improved estimation of causal effect predictiveness for a principal surrogate endpoint.
    Zigler CM; Belin TR
    Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):922-32. PubMed ID: 22348277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.