206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11870848)
1. Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.
Buckley DL
Magn Reson Med; 2002 Mar; 47(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 11870848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.
Donaldson SB; West CM; Davidson SE; Carrington BM; Hutchison G; Jones AP; Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 20187179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.
Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of intravoxel contrast agent diffusion on the analysis of DCE-MRI data in realistic tissue domains.
Woodall RT; Barnes SL; Hormuth DA; Sorace AG; Quarles CC; Yankeelov TE
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jul; 80(1):330-340. PubMed ID: 29115690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of vessel permeability by combining dynamic contrast-enhanced and arterial spin labeling MRI.
Liu HL; Chang TT; Yan FX; Li CH; Lin YS; Wong AM
NMR Biomed; 2015 Jun; 28(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 25880892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas.
Harrer JU; Parker GJ; Haroon HA; Buckley DL; Embelton K; Roberts C; Balériaux D; Jackson A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):748-57. PubMed ID: 15503330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography.
Zhang JL; Conlin CC; Carlston K; Xie L; Kim D; Morrell G; Morton K; Lee VS
NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 27200499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates.
Aref M; Chaudhari AR; Bailey KL; Aref S; Wiener EC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1279-93. PubMed ID: 18487033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precise measurement of renal filtration and vascular parameters using a two-compartment model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the kidney gives realistic normal values.
Tofts PS; Cutajar M; Mendichovszky IA; Peters AM; Gordon I
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1320-30. PubMed ID: 22415410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow versus permeability weighting in estimating the forward volumetric transfer constant (K
Li CH; Chen FH; Schellingerhout D; Lin YS; Hong JH; Liu HL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():105-111. PubMed ID: 27989901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Naish JH; Kershaw LE; Buckley DL; Jackson A; Waterton JC; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Jun; 61(6):1507-14. PubMed ID: 19319896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.
Tofts PS; Brix G; Buckley DL; Evelhoch JL; Henderson E; Knopp MV; Larsson HB; Lee TY; Mayr NA; Parker GJ; Port RE; Taylor J; Weisskoff RM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Sep; 10(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 10508281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise.
Benner T; Heiland S; Erb G; Forsting M; Sartor K
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 9201678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of perfusion parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of lung and liver tumors: effect on estimates of patient sample size in clinical trials and on individual patient responses.
Ng CS; Raunig DL; Jackson EF; Ashton EA; Kelcz F; Kim KB; Kurzrock R; McShane TM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W134-40. PubMed ID: 20093564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images.
Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK
Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of pancreatic cancer by multiple breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T.
Yao X; Zeng M; Wang H; Sun F; Rao S; Ji Y
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e917-22. PubMed ID: 22695786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DUSTER: dynamic contrast enhance up-sampled temporal resolution analysis method.
Liberman G; Louzoun Y; Artzi M; Nadav G; Ewing JR; Ben Bashat D
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 26708030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
