These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11870910)

  • 1. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues.
    Padhani AR; Hayes C; Landau S; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2002 Apr; 15(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11870910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.
    Galbraith SM; Lodge MA; Taylor NJ; Rustin GJ; Bentzen S; Stirling JJ; Padhani AR
    NMR Biomed; 2002 Apr; 15(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 11870909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of pelvic and lumbar bone marrow: effect of age and marrow fat content on pharmacokinetic parameter values.
    Breault SR; Heye T; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Merkle EM; Reiner CS; Faridi KF; Gupta RT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):W297-303. PubMed ID: 23436875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for prostate cancer: relationship between image noise, voxel size, and repeatability.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; Jeukens CR; Groenendaal G; Moman MR; Luijten P; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):976-84. PubMed ID: 20663968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of contrast agent injection duration on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification in prostate cancer.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; van Osch MJP; van der Heide UA
    NMR Biomed; 2018 Sep; 31(9):e3946. PubMed ID: 29974981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.
    Bliesener Y; Lebel RM; Acharya J; Frayne R; Nayak KS
    Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):410-420. PubMed ID: 34100683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic MRI of breast hardness following radiation treatment.
    Padhani AR; Yarnold J; Regan J; Husband JE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Apr; 17(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 12655581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.
    Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Simonis FFJ; van den Berg CAT; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; Isebaert S; Haustermans K; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 May; 81(5):3358-3369. PubMed ID: 30656738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility and correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative dynamic and intrinsic susceptibility-weighted MRI parameters in the benign and malignant human prostate.
    Alonzi R; Taylor NJ; Stirling JJ; d'Arcy JA; Collins DJ; Saunders MI; Hoskin PJ; Padhani AR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 20578023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and correlations of dynamic contrast enhanced and T2* MRI in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Klaassen R; Gurney-Champion OJ; Wilmink JW; Besselink MG; Engelbrecht MRW; Stoker J; Nederveen AJ; van Laarhoven HWM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jul; 50():1-9. PubMed ID: 29476781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
    Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of signal intensities and contrast after fat suppression in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine.
    Georgy BA; Hesselink JR; Middleton MS
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):731-4. PubMed ID: 8883513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application on the quantitative perfusion parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the pathological subtype of uterine leiomyoma].
    Zheng J; Zhao ZH; Yang JF; Zhao L; Yang LM; Hu HJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 97(15):1155-1159. PubMed ID: 28427122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.
    Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    He D; Fan X; Chatterjee A; Wang S; Medved M; Pineda FD; Yousuf A; Antic T; Oto A; Karczmar GS
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(15):155012. PubMed ID: 31220816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.
    He D; Zamora M; Oto A; Karczmar GS; Fan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):N445-N459. PubMed ID: 28786402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.