These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1187290)

  • 1. Effect of threat of shock for being disfluent of fluency of normal speakers.
    Silverman FH; Silverman EM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Oct; 41(2):353-4. PubMed ID: 1187290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual disfluency in drawing while producing and listening to disfluent speech.
    Dayalu V; Teulings HL; Bowers A; Crawcour S; Saltuklaroglu T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 23810715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency.
    Meyers SC; Freeman FJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 4046583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constancy of relative timing for stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 3230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of instruction to sing on stuttering frequency at normal and fast rates.
    Glover H; Kalinowski J; Rastatter M; Stuart A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Oct; 83(2):511-22. PubMed ID: 8902026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-related reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers: diagnostic implications.
    Bakker K; Brutten GJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 May; 55(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 2329792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic measures of stutterers' and nonstutterers' fluency in two speech contexts.
    Healey EC; Ramig PR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 3762096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autonomic correlates of stuttering and speech assessed in a range of experimental tasks.
    Weber CM; Smith A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):690-706. PubMed ID: 2273884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Punishment and negative reinforcement of stuttering using electric shock.
    Martin R; Louis KS; Haroldson S; Hasbrouck J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):478-90. PubMed ID: 1186157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The lack of focused anticipation of verbal information in stutterers: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Walla P; Mayer D; Deecke L; Thurner S
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1321-7. PubMed ID: 15219604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choral reading with filtered speech: effect on stuttering.
    Rami MK; Kalinowski J; Rastatter MP; Holbert D; Allen M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):421-31. PubMed ID: 15974353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions.
    Healey EC; Howe SW
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Dec; 20(6):493-506. PubMed ID: 3693593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal factors in the effects of masking noise on fluency of stutterers.
    Altrows IF; Bryden MP
    J Commun Disord; 1977 Jun; 10(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 925194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of speech envelopes of stutters and nonstutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1105-10. PubMed ID: 8759963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Lechner BK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 491561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stuttering as operant behavior: effects of the verbal stimuli wrong, right, and tree on the disfluency rates of school-age stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Daly DA; Kimbarow ML
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Sep; 21(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 713525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural drive to muscles in stuttering.
    Smith A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 2739376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple and effective treatment for stuttering: speech practice without audience.
    Yamada J; Homma T
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(6):1196-9. PubMed ID: 17512678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpreting results of the fluent speech paradigm in stuttering research: difficulties in separating cause from effect.
    Armson J; Kalinowski J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 8170133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of selected work attributes on preschoolers' speech disfluency: initial phoneme and length.
    Silverman EM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 1186152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.