These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1187317)

  • 1. Inhibitory effect of a second stimulus on reaction time to a primary stimulus: a partial successful replication.
    Rakover SS; Kaminer H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Oct; 41(2):635-41. PubMed ID: 1187317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the inhibitory effect of a second stimulus following the primary stimulus to react: a successful replication.
    Kitterle FL; Helson H
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):138-41. PubMed ID: 5083117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibitory function in the stimulus-response compatibility task.
    Tsuchida N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Feb; 100(1):249-57. PubMed ID: 15773715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.
    Bernstein IH; Chu PK; Briggs P; Schurman DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 4515814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time.
    Sanders AF; Wertheim AH
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 4515817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response-stimulus interval performance of nonretarded and institutionalized retarded subjects.
    Friedrich D; Libkuman T; Hawkins WF
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Jul; 79(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 4432886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral decrement following stimulus preexposure: effects of number of preexposures, presence of a second stimulus, and interstimulus interval in children and adults.
    Alek M; Arzy J; Lubow RE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1975 Apr; 1(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 1141822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the control of single-prime negative priming: the effects of practice and time course.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 19686021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interstimulus contingency facilitates saccadic responses in a bimodal go/no-go task.
    Kirchner H; Colonius H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):261-72. PubMed ID: 16040236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships among visual awareness, reaction time, and lateralized readiness potential in a simple reaction time task under the backward masking paradigm.
    Suzuki K; Imanaka K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):187-207. PubMed ID: 19831100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of audiovisual speech correspondences without visual awareness.
    Alsius A; Munhall KG
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 23462756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation.
    Feng T; Qiu Y; Zhu Y; Tong S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 18482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.