These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873711)

  • 1. The case of the missing data: methods of dealing with dropouts and other research vagaries.
    Streiner DL
    Can J Psychiatry; 2002 Feb; 47(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 11873711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on LOCF imputation.
    Cook RJ; Zeng L; Yi GY
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):820-8. PubMed ID: 15339307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the random-effects pattern mixture model with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts.
    Siddiqui O; Ali MW
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 9855033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing missing data assumptions in longitudinal studies: an example using a smoking cessation trial.
    Yang X; Shoptaw S
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2005 Mar; 77(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 15734221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes.
    Wood AM; White IR; Hillsdon M; Carpenter J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 15333619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MMRM versus MI in dealing with missing data--a comparison based on 25 NDA data sets.
    Siddiqui O
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 21442517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
    Ali MW; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.
    Shrive FM; Stuart H; Quan H; Ghali WA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17166270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
    Frank Liu G; Zhan X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Clark WS; David SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 11459446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling drop-out in longitudinal clinical trials: a comparison of the LOCF and MMRM approaches.
    Lane P
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 17351897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.
    DeSouza CM; Legedza AT; Sankoh AJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1055-73. PubMed ID: 20183464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods of handling missing data in individual patient data meta-analyses: an empirical example on antibiotics in children with acute otitis media.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):540-5. PubMed ID: 18184640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for handling missing data in palliative care research.
    Fielding S; Fayers PM; Loge JH; Jordhøy MS; Kaasa S
    Palliat Med; 2006 Dec; 20(8):791-8. PubMed ID: 17148533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.
    Bono C; Ried LD; Kimberlin C; Vogel B
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 17350555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random regression with imputed values for dropouts.
    Overall JE; Shobaki G; Fiore J
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 8961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical problems caused by missing data resulting from neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomies in long-term posterior capsule opacification studies: problem identification and possible solutions.
    Buehl W; Heinzl H; Mittlboeck M; Findl O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 18242452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation strategies for blood pressure data nonignorably missing due to medication use.
    Cook NR
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 17060215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.