These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873746)

  • 1. Measuring cardiac output: intermittent bolus thermodilution method.
    Gawlinski A
    Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):118-20, 122-4. PubMed ID: 11873746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thermodilution: an advanced technique for measuring continuous cardiac output.
    Guilbeau JR; Applegate AR
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1996; 15(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8631218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of hemodynamic pressure measurements on derived hemodynamic parameters.
    Urquhart G; Jensen L
    Dynamics; 2003; 14(3):13-20. PubMed ID: 14725142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution.
    Cecconi M; Dawson D; Casaretti R; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2010 Dec; 76(12):1010-7. PubMed ID: 20634793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues in methods and measurement of thermodilution cardiac output.
    Sommers MS; Woods SL; Courtade MA
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 8337161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac output: theory, technique, and troubleshooting.
    Gardner PE
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1989 Sep; 1(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 2684243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring.
    Hett DA; Jonas MM
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2004 Apr; 20(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 15072778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is continuous really continuous?
    Buhre W; Rex S
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Feb; 36(2):628-30. PubMed ID: 18216618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac output determination by the thermodilution method: comparison of ice-temperature injectate versus room-temperature injectate contained in prefilled syringes or a closed injectate delivery system.
    Barcelona M; Patague L; Bunoy M; Gloriani M; Justice B; Robinson L
    Heart Lung; 1985 May; 14(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 3852814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
    Breukers RB; Jansen JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac continuous cardiac output monitor.
    Zimmermann A; Kufner C; Hofbauer S; Steinwendner J; Hitzl W; Fritsch G; Schistek R; Kirnbauer M; Pauser G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Jun; 22(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 18503926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.
    Mekis D; Kamenik M; Starc V; Jeretin S
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
    Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous cardiac output monitoring--further applications of the thermodilution principle.
    Böttiger BW
    Intensive Care Med; 1999 Feb; 25(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 10193535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are?
    Cecconi M; Grounds M; Rhodes A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Jun; 13(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 17468561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In search of a better watch.
    Gilbert TB
    Crit Care Med; 1999 Nov; 27(11):2578-9. PubMed ID: 10579289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic computed tomography to determine cardiac output in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
    Raman SV; Tran T; Simonetti OP; Sun B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1213-7. PubMed ID: 19379994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac output determination.
    Woods SL; Osguthorpe S
    AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs; 1993 Feb; 4(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 8452746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients: comparison of room-temperature and iced injectate.
    Vennix CV; Nelson DH; Pierpont GL
    Heart Lung; 1984 Sep; 13(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 6565688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.