These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873772)

  • 21. [Correlation study between spinal curvatures and vertebral and disk deformities in idiopathic scoliosis].
    Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Labelle H
    Ann Chir; 1999; 53(8):798-807. PubMed ID: 10584392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Construction of local vertebral coordinate systems using a digitizing probe. Technical note.
    Crawford NR; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 9076889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A biological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column.
    Bogduk N; Amevo B; Pearcy M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1995; 209(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 8519407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part II. Implications for chiropractic theories and practice.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 9567238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distal fusion level selection in Lenke 1A curves according to axial plane analyses.
    Erdemir C; Musaoğlu R; Selek Ö; Gök Ü; Şarlak AY
    Spine J; 2015 Nov; 15(11):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26208878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a real-time three-dimensional spinal motion measurement system for clinical practice.
    Goodvin C; Park EJ; Huang K; Sakaki K
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Dec; 44(12):1061-75. PubMed ID: 17102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of zygapophysial joint orientation and uncinate processes in controlling motion in the cervical spine.
    Milne N
    J Anat; 1991 Oct; 178():189-201. PubMed ID: 1810926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine.
    White AA; Johnson RM; Panjabi MM; Southwick WO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):85-96. PubMed ID: 1132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A method to calculate relative spinal motion without digitization.
    Wu C; Mehbod AA; Erkan S; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 18790682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of 2 methods of measuring spine angular kinematics during dynamic flexion movements: skin-mounted markers compared with markers affixed to rigid bodies.
    Howarth SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014; 37(9):688-95. PubMed ID: 25455835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spinal constraint modulates head instantaneous center of rotation and dictates head angular motion.
    Kuo C; Fanton M; Wu L; Camarillo D
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():220-228. PubMed ID: 29929891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimizing errors associated with calculating the location of the helical axis for spinal motions.
    Metzger MF; Faruk Senan NA; O'Reilly OM; Lotz JC
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2822-9. PubMed ID: 20969997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Errors in simulated vertebral motions using Cardan Euler angles with a least squares method.
    Plamondon A; Gagnon M
    J Biomech Eng; 1992 May; 114(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 1602770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Calculating the 2D motion of lumbar vertebrae using splines.
    McCane B; King TI; Abbott JH
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(14):2703-8. PubMed ID: 16325826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization technique for the calculation of in vitro three-dimensional vertebral motion.
    Shea M; Edwards WT; White AA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1995 Aug; 117(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 8618392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Statics and dynamics of the spine].
    Fredenhagen H
    Schweiz Z Sportmed; 1983 Dec; 31(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 6665547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Between-day reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk: A comparison of marker based protocols.
    Rast FM; Graf ES; Meichtry A; Kool J; Bauer CM
    J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):807-811. PubMed ID: 26920506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization.
    Kulig K; Landel R; Powers CM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Feb; 34(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 15029938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Procedure Selection and Patient Positioning Influence Spine Kinematics During High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Spinal Manipulation Applied to the Low Back.
    Bell S; D'Angelo K; Kawchuk GN; Triano JJ; Howarth SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017; 40(3):147-155. PubMed ID: 28196632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical analysis of cervical spine sagittal stiffness characteristics.
    Küçük H
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Sep; 37(9):1283-91. PubMed ID: 17207786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.