107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873793)
1. Sharing of profits is debated as the value of tissue rises.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 2000 May; ():A1,7. PubMed ID: 11873793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospecting for genetic gold: compensating genetic research donors.
Triber GA
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 2(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 11657635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA banking and informed consent -- part 1.
Weir RF; Horton JR
IRB; 1995; 17(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiting from patient tissue: can patients lay claim to profits from products derived from their tissues?
Med World News; 1985 Jun; 26(11):63. PubMed ID: 11645555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1986; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene treaty promises rewards for unique peoples.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1996 Nov; 152(2054):8. PubMed ID: 11656591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
Mortimer D
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. India fears patent and ethics abuses.
Schüklenk U
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):613. PubMed ID: 11644986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters.
Daar JF
Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA banking and informed consent -- part 2.
Weir RF; Horton JR
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):1-8. PubMed ID: 11653356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology.
Nelkin D; Andrews L
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):30-9. PubMed ID: 11656768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Participation in pedigree studies and the risk of impeded access to health insurance.
Kass NE
IRB; 1993; 15(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 11659704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ruling renews fears of limits on research.
Reinhold R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():19. PubMed ID: 11646695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue banking: genetic donations and informed consent.
Swibel LH
Princet J Bioeth; 1999; 2(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 11658144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene donors' rights at risk.
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6577):1. PubMed ID: 8609968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
Biagi KG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Source compensation for tissues and cells used in biotechnical research: why a source shouldn't share in the profits.
Dillon TP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(4):628-45. PubMed ID: 11650898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Religious leaders prepare to fight patents on genes.
Andrews EL
N Y Times Web; 1995 May; ():1, 35. PubMed ID: 11647071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
