These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873849)

  • 21. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.
    Duncan J; Martens S; Ward R
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):808-10. PubMed ID: 9194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands.
    Christmann C; Leuthold H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 14742180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of event-related potentials in attentional blink and repetition blindness.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():115-26. PubMed ID: 18035339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
    Mayer AR; Franco AR; Canive J; Harrington DL
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 May; 19(5):993-1007. PubMed ID: 18787235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality.
    Talsma D; Doty TJ; Strowd R; Woldorff MG
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Nov; 43(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 17076810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing.
    Olivers CN; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention.
    Juola JF; Botella J; Palacios A
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1303-17. PubMed ID: 15813196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for distinct attentional bottlenecks in attention switching and attentional blink tasks.
    Peterson MS; Juola JF
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jan; 127(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 10695949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: target selection and distractor inhibition.
    Olivers CN; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17002523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time perception in children with ADHD: the effects of task modality and duration.
    Plummer C; Humphrey N
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 15(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 18825522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness.
    Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Jun; 23(3):738-55. PubMed ID: 9180042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Priming T2 in a visual and auditory attentional blink task.
    Koelewijn T; Van der Burg E; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 May; 70(4):658-66. PubMed ID: 18556927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modality-specific and amodal sources of interference in the attentional blink.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Aug; 70(6):1000-15. PubMed ID: 18717386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities: an individual differences approach.
    Martens S; Kandula M; Duncan J
    PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15280. PubMed ID: 21151865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.