65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11873888)
1. Early discharge of low-risk women from cervical screening.
Ogilvie D
J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 11873888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A community-based cervical screening program in a remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory.
Gilles MT; Crewe S; Granites IN; Coppola A
Aust J Public Health; 1995 Oct; 19(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 8713197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a case-control study.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15471249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50.
Van Wijngaarden WJ; Duncan ID
BMJ; 1993 Apr; 306(6883):967-71. PubMed ID: 8490472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.
White MC; Shoemaker ML; Benard VB
Am J Prev Med; 2017 Sep; 53(3):392-395. PubMed ID: 28473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The case for stopping cervical screening at age 50.
Cruickshank ME; Angus V; Kelly M; McPhee S; Kitchener HC
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 May; 104(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 9166202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
Yu CK; Rymer J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.
Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz AT; Cruz-Valdez A; Salmerón J; Uribe P; Velasco-Mondragón E; Nevarez PH; Acosta RD; Hernández-Avila M
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9806):1868-73. PubMed ID: 22051739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer screening and subsequent procedures in women under the age of 25 years between 2007 and 2013 in France: a nationwide French healthcare database study.
Maura G; Chaignot C; Weill A; Alla F; Heard I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 28368950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Jacobs A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 16796480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening among low-income women: results of a national screening program, 1991-1995.
Lawson HW; Lee NC; Thames SF; Henson R; Miller DS
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 92(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 9794662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.
Sasieni PD; Cuzick J; Lynch-Farmery E
Br J Cancer; 1996 Apr; 73(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 8611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
Shield PW; Cox NC
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness and efficiency of opportunistic cervical cancer screening: comparison with organized screening.
Adab P; McGhee SM; Yanova J; Wong CM; Hedley AJ
Med Care; 2004 Jun; 42(6):600-9. PubMed ID: 15167328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
