These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11875401)

  • 1. UNEP "buys support for Cartagena," say critics.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):205. PubMed ID: 11875401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Report recommends ban of US GM maize in Mexico.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):6. PubMed ID: 15637599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International agricultural research.
    Borlaug NE
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5661):1137-8. PubMed ID: 14976297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leveling the field: answers to frequently asked questions about the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol.
    Freeman L
    Genewatch; 2003; 16(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 15255003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transgenic crops. China takes a bumpy road from the lab to the field.
    Yimin D; Mervis J
    Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2317-9. PubMed ID: 12493892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caution in China over GM crops.
    Niu C
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1013. PubMed ID: 12586923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International agbio consortium takes shape in Beijing.
    Rangel-Aldao R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1044. PubMed ID: 10545867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poorer nations turn to publicly developed GM crops.
    Cohen JI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15637614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 20-year African biotech plan.
    Singh JA; Daar AS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 18327231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plant biotechs defect.
    Aldridge S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):255. PubMed ID: 18327220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US agbio controversies continue.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):628. PubMed ID: 10409343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biotechnology. Japanese controversies over transgenic crop regulation.
    Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1572. PubMed ID: 15361611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow my leader.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1103. PubMed ID: 11731770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UN backs transgenic crops for poorer nations.
    Schrope M
    Nature; 2001 Jul; 412(6843):109. PubMed ID: 11449228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New Zealand's compromise calms GMO lobby.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1092. PubMed ID: 11731764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Organic farmers sue GMO producers.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):210. PubMed ID: 11875406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.