These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Italian public votes out anti-GMO Greens. Meldolesi A Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jul; 19(7):603-4. PubMed ID: 11433259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology. Apel A N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 20472105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests. Norrie C Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds. Stokstad E Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Follow my leader. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1103. PubMed ID: 11731770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Italian GMO ban could spread. Meldolesi A Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 11062425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation. Craddock N Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Smyth S; McHughen A Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Twixt cup and lip--biotechnology and resource-poor farmers. Tripp R Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Feb; 19(2):93. PubMed ID: 11175684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]