134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11876372)
1. Performance of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisae during wine fermentation is affected by manipulation strategies based on sporulation.
Gimren-Alcañiz JV; Matallana E
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 24(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 11876372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic stabilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae oenological strains by using benomyl.
Blasco L; Feijoo-Siota L; Veiga-Crespo P; Villa TG
Int Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 11(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 18645963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overexpression of csc1-1. A plausible strategy to obtain wine yeast strains undergoing accelerated autolysis.
Cebollero E; Martinez-Rodriguez A; Carrascosa AV; Gonzalez R
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 May; 246(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15869955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethanol tolerance of sugar transport, and the rectification of stuck wine fermentations.
Santos J; Sousa MJ; Cardoso H; Inácio J; Silva S; Spencer-Martins I; Leão C
Microbiology (Reading); 2008 Feb; 154(Pt 2):422-430. PubMed ID: 18227246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mitotic recombination and genetic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.
Puig S; Querol A; Barrio E; Pérez-Ortín JE
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 May; 66(5):2057-61. PubMed ID: 10788381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains for breeding through fermentation efficiency and tetrad analysis.
Fernández-González M; Úbeda JF; Briones AI
Curr Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 70(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 25447272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Allelic variants of hexose transporter Hxt3p and hexokinases Hxk1p/Hxk2p in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and interspecies hybrids.
Zuchowska M; Jaenicke E; König H; Claus H
Yeast; 2015 Nov; 32(11):657-69. PubMed ID: 26202678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stuck fermentation: development of a synthetic stuck wine and study of a restart procedure.
Maisonnave P; Sanchez I; Moine V; Dequin S; Galeote V
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 May; 163(2-3):239-47. PubMed ID: 23584364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotypic characterization of strains of commercial wine yeasts by tetrad analysis.
Johnston JR; Baccari C; Mortimer RK
Res Microbiol; 2000 Sep; 151(7):583-90. PubMed ID: 11037136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Silencing MIG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of antisense MIG1 expression and MIG1 gene disruption.
Olsson L; Larsen ME; Rønnow B; Mikkelsen JD; Nielsen J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 63(6):2366-71. PubMed ID: 9172357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expression of stress response genes in wine strains with different fermentative behavior.
Zuzuarregui A; del Olmo ML
FEMS Yeast Res; 2004 May; 4(7):699-710. PubMed ID: 15093773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FLO gene-dependent phenotypes in industrial wine yeast strains.
Govender P; Bester M; Bauer FF
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Apr; 86(3):931-45. PubMed ID: 20013339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of yeast diversity during wine fermentations with direct inoculation and pied de cuve method at an industrial scale.
Li E; Liu C; Liu Y
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 22(7):960-6. PubMed ID: 22580315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic manipulation of HSP26 and YHR087W stress genes may improve fermentative behaviour in wine yeasts under vinification conditions.
Jiménez-Martí E; Zuzuarregui A; Ridaura I; Lozano N; del Olmo M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 130(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 19217680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide identification of the Fermentome; genes required for successful and timely completion of wine-like fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Walker ME; Nguyen TD; Liccioli T; Schmid F; Kalatzis N; Sundstrom JF; Gardner JM; Jiranek V
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jul; 15(1):552. PubMed ID: 24993029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between cell lipid content, gene expression and fermentative behaviour of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains.
Zara G; Bardi L; Belviso S; Farris GA; Zara S; Budroni M
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 104(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17961155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency.
Gerke JP; Chen CT; Cohen BA
Genetics; 2006 Oct; 174(2):985-97. PubMed ID: 16951083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Yeast autolytic mutants potentially useful for sparkling wine production.
Gonzalez R; Martinez-Rodriguez AJ; Carrascosa AV
Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 84(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12781950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stuck at work? Quantitative proteomics of environmental wine yeast strains reveals the natural mechanism of overcoming stuck fermentation.
Szopinska A; Christ E; Planchon S; König H; Evers D; Renaut J
Proteomics; 2016 Feb; 16(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 26763469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of fermentation and enzyme expression profiles among industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Uebayashi K; Shimizu H; Matsuda F
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 102(16):7071-7081. PubMed ID: 29882163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
