127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11877787)
1. Morphometric analyses of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted-L osteotomy.
Cerajewska TL; Singh GD
Clin Anat; 2002 Mar; 15(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 11877787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphometry of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients following an inverted L osteotomy.
Singh GD; Hay AD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 10686847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in soft tissue facial profile of craniofacial microsomia patients: geometric morphometrics.
Cerajewska TL; Singh GD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 11563398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Euclidean distance matrix analysis of surgical changes in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted L osteotomy.
Hay AD; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Singh GD
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Sep; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 11034033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular transformations in prepubertal patients following treatment for craniofacial microsomia: thin-plate spline analysis.
Hay AD; Singh GD
Clin Anat; 2000; 13(5):361-72. PubMed ID: 10982996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis.
Singh GD; Clark WJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between bilateral condylar bone change and mandibular morphology: a study using morphometry.
Alkhamrah B; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 12353938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia.
Rachmiel A; Manor R; Peled M; Laufer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11429728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Components of soft tissue deformations in subjects with untreated angle's Class III malocclusions: thin-plate spline analysis.
Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10100051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morphometric analysis of the mandible in subjects with Class III malocclusion.
Pan JY; Chou ST; Chang HP; Liu PH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2006 Jul; 22(7):331-8. PubMed ID: 16849101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting long-term results in hemifacial microsomia.
Vargervik K; Ousterhout DK; Farias M
Cleft Palate J; 1986 Dec; 23 Suppl 1():53-68. PubMed ID: 3545547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 11302593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spline analysis of the mandible in human subjects with class III malocclusion.
Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
Arch Oral Biol; 1997 May; 42(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 9233843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Procrustes, Euclidean and cephalometric analyses of the morphology of the mandible in human Class III malocclusions.
Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
Arch Oral Biol; 1998 Jul; 43(7):535-43. PubMed ID: 9730271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular morphology in subjects with Class III malocclusions: Finite-element morphometry.
Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 9770098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniofacial morphometric analysis of mandibular prognathism.
Chang HP; Liu PH; Yang YH; Lin HC; Chang CH
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 16512884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
