These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11878276)

  • 1. Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet deformation monitored by double-pulse stereo photogrammetry.
    Gao BZ; Pandya S; Arana C; Hwang NH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Jan; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11878276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet motion monitored by dual camera stereo photogrammetry.
    Gao ZB; Pandya S; Hosein N; Sacks MS; Hwang NH
    J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 10653033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic in vitro quantification of bioprosthetic heart valve leaflet motion using structured light projection.
    Iyengar AKS ; Sugimoto H; Smith DB; Sacks MS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 29(11):963-73. PubMed ID: 11791679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leaflet stress quantification of porcine vs bovine surgical bioprostheses: an
    Stanová V; Godio Raboutet Y; Barragan P; Thollon L; Pibarot P; Rieu R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Jan; 25(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 34219548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural analysis of a stented pericardial heart valve with leaflets mounted externally.
    Avanzini A; Battini D
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):985-95. PubMed ID: 25252695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel method to quantitate bioprosthetic valve leaflet mechanical stress: a numerical and in vitro study.
    Stanová V; Godio Raboutet Y; Masson C; Py M; Barragan P; Thollon L; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Sep; 15(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 31130522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model of the geometrical changes in aortic valve leaflets in response to leaflet extension and variable boundary conditions.
    Fisher J; Butterfield M; Lockie KJ; Davies GA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1992; 206(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 1418197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root.
    Nicosia MA; Cochran RP; Einstein DR; Rutland CJ; Kunzelman KS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 14658821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element investigation of stentless pericardial aortic valves: relevance of leaflet geometry.
    Xiong FL; Goetz WA; Chong CK; Chua YL; Pfeifer S; Wintermantel E; Yeo JH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 20213213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.
    Mao W; Li K; Sun W
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Dec; 7(4):374-388. PubMed ID: 27844463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flat or curved pericardial aortic valve cusps: a finite element study.
    Lim KH; Candra J; Yeo JH; Duran CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 15473482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of the fluid-structure interaction simulation of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve.
    Kemp I; Dellimore K; Rodriguez R; Scheffer C; Blaine D; Weich H; Doubell A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 23907849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve.
    Smuts AN; Blaine DC; Scheffer C; Weich H; Doubell AF; Dellimore KH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21094482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation: implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment.
    Sun W; Li K; Sirois E
    J Biomech; 2010 Dec; 43(16):3085-90. PubMed ID: 20817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydrodynamic function of the second-generation mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Jennings LM; El-Gatit A; Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Jul; 74(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12118805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Leaflet Kinematics of Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Prostheses.
    Vennemann B; Rösgen T; Heinisch PP; Obrist D
    ASAIO J; 2018; 64(5):651-661. PubMed ID: 29045279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of leaflet skin friction and stiffness on the performance of bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Dellimore K; Kemp I; Scheffer C; Weich H; Doubell A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 36(4):473-86. PubMed ID: 24264225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.