These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11878479)

  • 1. Development of the spray drift task force database for aerial applications.
    Hewitt AJ; Johnson DR; Fish JD; Hermansky CG; Valcore DL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):648-58. PubMed ID: 11878479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.
    Bird SL; Perry SG; Ray SL; Teske ME
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):672-81. PubMed ID: 11878481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications.
    Teske ME; Bird SL; Esterly DM; Curbishley TB; Ray SL; Perry SG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):659-71. PubMed ID: 11878480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
    Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spray drift of pesticides arising from aerial application in cotton.
    Woods N; Craig IP; Dorr G; Young B
    J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 11401259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk assessment of environmental and bystander exposure from agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle sprayers in golden coconut plantations: Effects of droplet size and spray volume.
    Lan X; Wang J; Chen P; Liang Q; Zhang L; Ma C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Sep; 282():116675. PubMed ID: 38971099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What about upwind buffer zones for aerial applications?
    Kirk LW; Teske ME; Thistle HW
    J Agric Saf Health; 2002 Aug; 8(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 12363183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Wind Speed and Direction and Key Meteorological Parameters on Potential Pesticide Drift Mass Loadings from Sequential Aerial Applications.
    Desmarteau DA; Ritter AM; Hendley P; Guevara MW
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 31589364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
    De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation of drift of pesticides: development and validation of a model.
    Brusselman E; Spanoghe P; Van der Meeren P; Gabriels D; Steurbaut W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):749-58. PubMed ID: 15151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation--a review.
    Felsot AS; Unsworth JB; Linders JB; Roberts G; Rautman D; Harris C; Carazo E
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2011; 46(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 20981606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field evaluation of spray drift and nontargeted soybean injury from unmanned aerial spraying system herbicide application under acceptable operation conditions.
    Huang Z; Wang C; Li Y; Zhang H; Zeng A; He X
    Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Mar; 79(3):1140-1153. PubMed ID: 36349383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental, bystander and resident exposure from orchard applications using an agricultural unmanned aerial spraying system.
    Dubuis PH; Droz M; Melgar A; Zürcher UA; Zarn JA; Gindro K; König SLB
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 881():163371. PubMed ID: 37044339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.