These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11878480)

  • 1. AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications.
    Teske ME; Bird SL; Esterly DM; Curbishley TB; Ray SL; Perry SG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):659-71. PubMed ID: 11878480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.
    Bird SL; Perry SG; Ray SL; Teske ME
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):672-81. PubMed ID: 11878481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the spray drift task force database for aerial applications.
    Hewitt AJ; Johnson DR; Fish JD; Hermansky CG; Valcore DL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):648-58. PubMed ID: 11878479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What about upwind buffer zones for aerial applications?
    Kirk LW; Teske ME; Thistle HW
    J Agric Saf Health; 2002 Aug; 8(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 12363183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
    Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Baio FHR; Antuniassi UR; Castilho BR; Teodoro PE; Silva EED
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212289. PubMed ID: 30779797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spray drift of pesticides arising from aerial application in cotton.
    Woods N; Craig IP; Dorr G; Young B
    J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 11401259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling spray drift and runoff-related inputs of pesticides to receiving water.
    Zhang X; Luo Y; Goh KS
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():48-58. PubMed ID: 29156441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing exposure to allied ground troops in the Vietnam War: a comparison of AgDRIFT and Exposure Opportunity Index models.
    Ginevan ME; Ross JH; Watkins DK
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 18335003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvements in Modelling Bystander and Resident Exposure to Pesticide Spray Drift: Investigations into New Approaches for Characterizing the 'Collection Efficiency' of the Human Body.
    Butler Ellis MC; Kennedy MC; Kuster CJ; Alanis R; Tuck CR
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 May; 62(5):622-632. PubMed ID: 29562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pesticide drift. V. Vertical drift from aerial spray applications.
    Ware GW; Estesen BJ; Cahill WP; Frost KR
    J Econ Entomol; 1972 Apr; 65(2):590-2. PubMed ID: 5016673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Herbicide spray drift from ground and aerial applications: Implications for potential pollinator foraging sources.
    Butts TR; Fritz BK; Kouame KB; Norsworthy JK; Barber LT; Ross WJ; Lorenz GM; Thrash BC; Bateman NR; Adamczyk JJ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18017. PubMed ID: 36289439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation of drift of pesticides: development and validation of a model.
    Brusselman E; Spanoghe P; Van der Meeren P; Gabriels D; Steurbaut W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):749-58. PubMed ID: 15151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards.
    Briand O; Bertrand F; Seux R; Millet M
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 11991524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.