These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11879947)

  • 41. Nonlinear absorption in biological tissue for high intensity focused ultrasound.
    Liu X; Li J; Gong X; Zhang D
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e27-30. PubMed ID: 16844166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nonlinear shear wave interaction in soft solids.
    Jacob X; Catheline S; Gennisson JL; Barrière C; Royer D; Fink M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):1917-26. PubMed ID: 17902828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Possible temperature effects computed for acoustic microscopy used for living cells.
    Kujawska T; Wójcik J; Filipczyński L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 14962613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nonlinear native propagation effects of diagnostic ultrasound computed and measured in blood.
    Filipczyński L; Wójcik J; Kujawska T; Lypacewicz G; Tymkiewicz R; Zienkiewicz B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Feb; 27(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 11316534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Non-linear ultrasound imaging].
    Tranquart F; Grenier N
    J Radiol; 2000 Dec; 81(12):1731-5. PubMed ID: 11173769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ultrasound wave propagation in tissue and scattering from microbubbles for echo particle image velocimetry technique.
    Mukdadi O; Shandas R
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():364-70. PubMed ID: 15133985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. New approaches to nonlinear diffractive field propagation.
    Christopher PT; Parker KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):488-99. PubMed ID: 1880298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sum-of-harmonics method for improved narrowband and broadband signal quantification during passive monitoring of ultrasound therapies.
    Lyka E; Coviello C; Kozick R; Coussios CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):741. PubMed ID: 27475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A contrast source method for nonlinear acoustic wave fields in media with spatially inhomogeneous attenuation.
    Demi L; van Dongen KW; Verweij MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1221-30. PubMed ID: 21428485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Two-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Ultrasound in Liquids with Gas Bubble Agglomerates: Examples of Bubbly-Liquid-Type Acoustic Metamaterials (BLAMMs).
    Vanhille C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28106748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Optimization of a phased-array transducer for multiple harmonic imaging in medical applications: frequency and topology.
    Matte GM; Van Neer PL; Danilouchkine MG; Huijssen J; Verweij MD; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Mar; 58(3):533-46. PubMed ID: 21429845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modeling of an electrohydraulic lithotripter with the KZK equation.
    Averkiou MA; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 10420620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dynamic nonlinear focal shift in amplitude modulated moderately focused acoustic beams.
    Jiménez N; Camarena F; González-Salido N
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Mar; 75():106-114. PubMed ID: 27939786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance.
    Starritt HC; Hoad CL; Duck FA; Nassiri DK; Summers IR; Vennart W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 26(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 10722922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters.
    Szabo TL; Clougherty F; Grossman C
    J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 9952078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Nonlinear propagation acoustics of dual-frequency wide-band excitation pulses in a focused ultrasound system.
    Måsøy SE; Standal Ø; Deibele JM; Näsholm SP; Angelsen B; Johansen TF; Tangen TA; Hansen R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2695-703. PubMed ID: 21110565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating in situ exposure in the presence of acoustic nonlinearity.
    Duck FA
    J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 9952079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determination of nonlinear medium parameter B/A using model assisted variable-length measurement approach.
    Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):997-1005. PubMed ID: 21722932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of nonlinear distortion on acoustic radiation force elastography.
    Draudt AB; Cleveland RO
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1874-83. PubMed ID: 21963033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.