These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11880200)

  • 1. Magnetic responses of human visual cortex to illusory contours.
    Ohtani Y; Okamura S; Shibasaki T; Arakawa A; Yoshida Y; Toyama K; Ejima Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 321(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 11880200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The representation of Kanizsa illusory contours in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.
    Sáry G; Köteles K; Kaposvári P; Lenti L; Csifcsák G; Frankó E; Benedek G; Tompa T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2137-46. PubMed ID: 19046395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical oscillatory activity associated with the perception of illusory and real visual contours.
    Kinsey K; Anderson SJ; Hadjipapas A; Nevado A; Hillebrand A; Holliday IE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 19397939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex.
    Alink A; Schwiedrzik CM; Kohler A; Singer W; Muckli L
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(8):2960-6. PubMed ID: 20181593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps.
    Barnikol UB; Amunts K; Dammers J; Mohlberg H; Fieseler T; Malikovic A; Zilles K; Niedeggen M; Tass PA
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):86-108. PubMed ID: 16480895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography.
    Maruyama K; Kaneoke Y; Watanabe K; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2002 Oct; 44(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 12354634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early processing in the human lateral occipital complex is highly responsive to illusory contours but not to salient regions.
    Shpaner M; Murray MM; Foxe JJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 30(10):2018-28. PubMed ID: 19895562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal summation of magnetic response to chromatic stimulus in the human visual cortex.
    Ohtani Y; Okamura S; Ejima Y
    Neuroreport; 2002 Sep; 13(13):1641-4. PubMed ID: 12352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain mechanisms for perceiving illusory lines in humans.
    Anken J; Tivadar RI; Knebel JF; Murray MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():182-189. PubMed ID: 30008430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuronal correlates of real and illusory contour perception: functional anatomy with PET.
    Larsson J; Amunts K; Gulyás B; Malikovic A; Zilles K; Roland PE
    Eur J Neurosci; 1999 Nov; 11(11):4024-36. PubMed ID: 10583491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boundary completion is automatic and dissociable from shape discrimination.
    Murray MM; Imber ML; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 26(46):12043-54. PubMed ID: 17108178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human cortical response to various apparent motions: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Tanaka E; Noguchi Y; Kakigi R; Kaneoke Y
    Neurosci Res; 2007 Oct; 59(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human brain response to visual stimulus between lower/upper visual fields and cerebral hemispheres.
    Lee B; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R; Sakai Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 19643151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation of summation and peak latencies in visual processing: an MEG study on stimulus eccentricity.
    Zhou B; Bao Y; Sander T; Trahms L; Pöppel E
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Oct; 483(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 20674677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI.
    Moradi F; Liu LC; Cheng K; Waggoner RA; Tanaka K; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2003 Mar; 18(3):595-609. PubMed ID: 12667837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal enhanced neural responses to illusory surfaces during a concurrent visual attention task.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():217-227. PubMed ID: 30999213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual responses in the temporal cortex to moving objects with invariant contours.
    Tanaka YZ; Koyama T; Mikami A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Sep; 146(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 12195527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.