116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1188121)
1. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques.
Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE
Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials.
Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems.
Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA
Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of xeroradiographic exposures.
Jaeger SS; Cacak RK; Barnes JE; Hendee WR
Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 663213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
Evers R; Römer M
Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of xeroradiographic image quality.
Zeman GH; Rao GU; Osterman FA
Radiology; 1976 Jun; 119(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 935409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 6981974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose reduction in xeroradiography of the breast.
Van De Riet W; Wolfe JN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 May; 128(5):821-3. PubMed ID: 404909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
