These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11881278)

  • 1. [Supplemental imaging methods in evaluation of the extent of cervical carcinoma].
    Krjak M; Mlyncek M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2002 Jan; 67(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11881278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping the extent of disease by multislice computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node evaluation in stage I and II cervical carcinoma.
    Rajaram S; Sharma H; Bhargava SK; Tripathi RP; Goel N; Mehta S
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 21119251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carcinoma of the cervix: role of MR imaging.
    Chiang SH; Quek ST
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2003 Jul; 32(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 12968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging in cervical cancer.
    Follen M; Levenback CF; Iyer RB; Grigsby PW; Boss EA; Delpassand ES; Fornage BD; Fishman EK
    Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2028-38. PubMed ID: 14603539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
    Lemke U; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
    Mezrich R
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis.
    Scheidler J; Hricak H; Yu KK; Subak L; Segal MR
    JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(13):1096-101. PubMed ID: 9315770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of computed tomography and lymphography in staging carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Marincek B; Devaud MC; Triller J; Fuchs WA
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 May; 4(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6734609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Imaging of cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Soyer P; Michel G; Masselot J
    J Radiol; 1990 Dec; 71(12):681-9. PubMed ID: 2290148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
    Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The role of laparoscopic interventions in diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer].
    Maksimov SIa; Kargopolova MV; Berlev IV; Khadzhimba AS; Urmancheeva AF; Mikaia NA
    Vopr Onkol; 2012; 58(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 22774528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical tumors.
    Sahdev A
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Oct; 31(5):399-413. PubMed ID: 20974359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer.
    Testa AC; Di Legge A; De Blasis I; Moruzzi MC; Bonatti M; Collarino A; Rufini V; Manfredi R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):741-68. PubMed ID: 24861248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
    Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.