These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11881916)

  • 1. Band-pass specific contributions of multiple generators to the auditory 40-Hz steady state potentials.
    Pratt H; Mittelman N; Bleich N; Zaaroor M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11881916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalent dipoles of the binaural interaction components and their comparison with binaurally evoked human auditory 40 Hz steady-state evoked potentials.
    Zaaroor M; Bleich N; Mittelman N; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2003 Jun; 24(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 12799547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of click frequency bands to the human binaural interaction components.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 10582533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-channel Lissajous' trajectories of auditory brainstem evoked potentials: contribution of fast and slow components to planar segment formation.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Feingold K
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):159-70. PubMed ID: 2312411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of low-pass filtering on the primary cortical auditory potential of the rat.
    Shaw NA
    J Neurosci Methods; 1995 Jul; 59(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 8531489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory brainstem, middle and late latency responses to short gaps in noise at different presentation rates.
    Alhussaini K; Bohorquez J; Delgado RE; Ozdamar O
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 29378459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of evoked potentials and high-frequency (gamma-band) oscillating potentials in rat auditory cortex.
    Franowicz MN; Barth DS
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Jul; 74(1):96-112. PubMed ID: 7472356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of azimuth and elevation cues for sound localization in human middle latency auditory evoked potentials.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 12677111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of auditory stimulation rates on evoked potentials during general anesthesia: relation between the transient auditory middle-latency response and the 40-Hz auditory steady state response.
    McNeer RR; Bohórquez J; Ozdamar O
    Anesthesiology; 2009 May; 110(5):1026-35. PubMed ID: 19352165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation of the 40-hertz auditory steady state response by propofol involves the cortical and subcortical generators.
    Plourde G; Garcia-Asensi A; Backman S; Deschamps A; Chartrand D; Fiset P; Picton TW
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Feb; 108(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 18212568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for efferent effects on early components of the human auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H; Shi Y
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Nov; 108(6):543-53. PubMed ID: 9872425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields.
    Pantev C; Elbert T; Makeig S; Hampson S; Eulitz C; Hoke M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 7691563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
    Slugocki C; Bosnyak D; Trainor LJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-channel Lissajous' trajectory of auditory brain-stem potentials evoked by specific frequency bands (derived responses).
    Kaminer M; Pratt H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Feb; 66(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 2431881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of auditory evoked potentials to acoustic beats and to binaural beats.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 262(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 20123120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of click polarity on the binaural interaction components of human auditory brainstem-evoked potentials: a three-channel Lissajous trajectory study.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Audiology; 1994; 33(5):264-73. PubMed ID: 7818380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cumulative effect of high click rate on monaural and binaural processing in the human auditory brainstem.
    Polyakov A; Pratt H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 114(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 12559246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.