These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11883764)

  • 1. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.
    Saunders E; Cohen L; Aschendorff A; Shapiro W; Knight M; Stecker M; Richter B; Waltzman S; Tykocinski M; Roland T; Laszig R; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. PubMed ID: 11883764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Roland JT; Luxford W; Leake PA
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 15855030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design.
    Tykocinski M; Saunders E; Cohen LT; Treaba C; Briggs RJ; Gibson P; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 11314713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Knight MR; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Balkany TJ; Eshraghi AA; Yang N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 122(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 12125990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
    Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship Between Electrode-to-Modiolus Distance and Current Levels for Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Davis TJ; Zhang D; Gifford RH; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26649603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants.
    Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A psychophysical forward masking comparison of longitudinal spread of neural excitation in the Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Bender von Saebelkampf C; Busby PA; Cowan RS
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Oct; 44(10):559-66. PubMed ID: 16315446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Electrical Stimulation Levels Across Ears for Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Galvin KL; Abdi R; Dowell RC; Nayagam B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1174-1186. PubMed ID: 30807543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2001 May; 155(1-2):63-81. PubMed ID: 11335077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Luxford W; Leake P
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):68-79. PubMed ID: 15855031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.
    Hughes ML; Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Lowder MW
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):471-86. PubMed ID: 11770670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 67(8):873-80. PubMed ID: 12880667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.