450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11883765)
1. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults.
Skinner MW; Holden LK; Whitford LA; Plant KL; Psarros C; Holden TA
Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 12072613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Demorest ME
Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):463-76. PubMed ID: 12411779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception and speech production outcomes.
Psarros CE; Plant KL; Lee K; Decker JA; Whitford LA; Cowan RS
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):18S-27S. PubMed ID: 11885571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results.
Parkinson AJ; Arcaroli J; Staller SJ; Arndt PL; Cosgriff A; Ebinger K
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):41S-48S. PubMed ID: 11883766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition with the advanced combination encoder and transient emphasis spectral maxima strategies in nucleus 24 recipients.
Holden LK; Vandali AE; Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):681-701. PubMed ID: 16197281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system.
Kiefer J; Hohl S; Stürzebecher E; Pfennigdorff T; Gstöettner W
Audiology; 2001; 40(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 11296939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different speech coding strategies using a disability-based inventory and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise.
Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 12806290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients.
Pasanisi E; Bacciu A; Vincenti V; Guida M; Berghenti MT; Barbot A; Panu F; Bacciu S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 64(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 12049828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Rakszawski B; Wright R; Cadieux JH; Davidson LS; Brenner C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study.
James CJ; Blamey PJ; Martin L; Swanson B; Just Y; Macfarlane D
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):49S-58S. PubMed ID: 11883767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
