BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11884810)

  • 1. Distraction osteogenesis of costochondral bone grafts in the mandible.
    Stelnicki EJ; Hollier L; Lee C; Lin WY; Grayson B; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Mar; 109(3):925-33; discussion 934-5. PubMed ID: 11884810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction osteogenesis of costocartilaginous rib grafts and treatment algorithm for severely hypoplastic mandibles.
    Wan DC; Taub PJ; Allam KA; Perry A; Tabit CJ; Kawamoto HK; Bradley JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 May; 127(5):2005-2013. PubMed ID: 21532427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costochondral grafting in craniofacial microsomia.
    Tahiri Y; Chang CS; Tuin J; Paliga JT; Lowe KM; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):530-541. PubMed ID: 25626797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction osteogenesis of costochondral neomandibles: a clinical experience.
    Corcoran J; Hubli EH; Salyer KE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Aug; 100(2):311-5; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 9252596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction lengthening of the mandibular costochondral graft: a precautionary note.
    Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jul; 11(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 11314383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dove tail osteotomy in distraction osteogenesis of costochondral bone grafts in the mandible: a new concept.
    Höenig JF; Grohmann UA; Merten HA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 15(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 15167257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Standard Costochondral Grafting in Patients With Bilateral Craniofacial Microsomia.
    Serebrakian AT; Golinko MS; Alperovich M; Runyan CM; Staffenberg DA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):e673-e676. PubMed ID: 27617809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fibrous ankylosis after distraction osteogenesis of a costochondral neomandible in a patient with grade III hemifacial microsomia.
    Thomas DJ; Rees MJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 12(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 11572253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modern Mandibular Distraction Applications in Hemifacial Microsomia.
    Shakir S; Bartlett SP
    Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):375-389. PubMed ID: 34051892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: Part 1: Laboratory study.
    Luchs JS; Stelnicki EJ; Rowe NM; Naijher NS; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 13(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12000874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unique Techniques Utilizing Rib Grafts for Mandibular Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population.
    Liu A; Odono LT; Wlodarczyk JR; Garg RK; Hammoudeh JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1780-1784. PubMed ID: 33852516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mandibular hypoplasia. Growth induction by osteochondral transplants or callus distraction?].
    Appel T; Bergé S; Niederhagen B; Reich RH; Berten J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Sep; 4 Suppl 2():S428-31. PubMed ID: 11094510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible applied to an iliac crest graft: report of a case.
    Nocini PF; Albanese M; Buttura da Prato E; D'Agostino A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 15142101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of pediatric mandibular distraction.
    Hollier LH; Higuera S; Stal S; Taylor TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2333-6. PubMed ID: 16772939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total reconstruction of mandible by transport distraction after complete resection for benign and malignant tumors.
    Balaji SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 27237215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in facial asymmetry patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis.
    Yoon HJ; Kim HG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 31(5):544-8. PubMed ID: 12418572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Callus molding in external and internal distraction of mandible.
    Balaji SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 26888239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distraction osteogenesis in the pediatric population.
    Lin SJ; Roy S; Patel PK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17666247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis.
    Roth DA; Gosain AK; McCarthy JG; Stracher MA; Lefton DR; Grayson BH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1237-47; discussion 1248-50. PubMed ID: 9105350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.
    Kuriakose MA; Shnayder Y; DeLacure MD
    Head Neck; 2003 Oct; 25(10):816-24. PubMed ID: 12966505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.