These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885172)
41. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Efficacy of threaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed in the posterior mandible in support of fixed prostheses. Buchs AU; Hahn J; Vassos DM Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9081576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded tapered screw-vent implants: results after two years of functional loading. Khayat PG; Milliez SN J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 17912964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated Micro-Vent and pure titanium Swede-Vent implants. Evian CI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 8908863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after implant removal. A case report. Covani U; Marconcini S; Santini S; Cornelini R; Barone A Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 20967310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Success of multiple endosseous dental implant designs to second-stage surgery across study sites. Morris HF; Manz MC; Tarolli JH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12 Suppl 5):76-82. PubMed ID: 9393430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A noninterventional study documenting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice. Luongo G; Oteri G J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 20735267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants. Carr AB; Choi YG; Eckert SE; Desjardins RP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 12814315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants. West JD; Oates TW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 17929524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Factors associated with failure of surface-modified implants up to four years of function. Cosyn J; Vandenbulcke E; Browaeys H; Van Maele G; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 20491819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Bernard JP; ten Bruggenkate CM; Buser D; Taylor TD; Weingart D; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Oates TW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1324-32. PubMed ID: 22167440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets. Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants. Strietzel FP; Reichart PA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting. Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a case for their use. Morris HF; Ochi S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 56(11):1303-11. PubMed ID: 9820219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]