173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885177)
21. A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla.
Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Cucchi A; Corrocher G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 21483891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Histologic analysis of a fractured implant: a case report.
Brunel G; Armand S; Miller N; Rue J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Oct; 20(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 11203589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A modular approach to dental implant therapy: the appropriate selection of one- and two-stage surgeries.
Cooper LF
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Sep; 23(9 Suppl 2):4-12. PubMed ID: 12790008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration.
Lee EH; Ryu SM; Kim JY; Cho BO; Lee YC; Park YJ; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1345-52. PubMed ID: 20356664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. AICRG, Part III: The influence of antibiotic use on the survival of a new implant design.
Morris HF; Ochi S; Plezia R; Gilbert H; Dent CD; Pikulski J; Lambert PM
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 15255391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after implant removal. A case report.
Covani U; Marconcini S; Santini S; Cornelini R; Barone A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 20967310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthwashes as adjuncts to single-stage dental implants: a comparative study.
Horwitz J; Machtei EE; Zuabi O; Peled M
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 15857065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Changes in peri-implant tissues subjected to orthodontic forces and ligature breakdown in monkeys.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kohal RJ; Rohde M; Strub JR; Teuscher U; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 9579628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 12500876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.
Bischof M; Nedir R; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 15355394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of threaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed in the posterior mandible in support of fixed prostheses.
Buchs AU; Hahn J; Vassos DM
Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9081576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering.
Spray JR; Black CG; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 11885170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Retrospective analysis of 736 implants inserted without antibiotic therapy.
Mazzocchi A; Passi L; Moretti R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2321-3. PubMed ID: 17954332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
