These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885352)

  • 1. A pilot study of three methods for the reduction of bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems in routine use.
    Jatzwauk L; Reitemeier B
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Feb; 204(5-6):303-8. PubMed ID: 11885352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Decontamination of dental unit waterlines using disinfectants and filters].
    Monarca S; Garusi G; Gigola P; Spampinato L; Zani C; Sapelli PL
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002 Oct; 51(10):451-9. PubMed ID: 12548184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental unit water: bacterial decontamination of old and new dental units by flushing water.
    Watanabe E; Agostinho AM; Matsumoto W; Ito I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18205655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring the decontamination efficacy of the novel Poseidon-S disinfectant system in dental unit water lines.
    Fujita M; Mashima I; Nakazawa F
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2017 Jun; 50(3):270-276. PubMed ID: 26066542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an automated dental unit water system's contamination control protocol.
    Puttaiah R; Svoboda KK; Lin SM; Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt D; Siebert J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22430686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: a one-year study.
    O'Donnell MJ; Shore AC; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):648-61. PubMed ID: 16442201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of the efficacy of super-oxidised (Optident/Sterilox) water for the disinfection of dental unit water lines.
    Martin MV; Gallagher MA
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):353-4; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15789102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of a glutaraldehyde formulation in decontamination of dental unit water systems.
    Gigola P; Angelillo V; Garusi G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006; 55(7-8):437-48. PubMed ID: 17041544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of bacterial contamination in microfiltered water dispensers (MWDs) by disinfection.
    Zanetti F; De Luca G; Sacchetti R
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Jan; 128(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 19017550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pilot study of 2 methods for control of dental unit biofilms.
    Kim PJ; Cederberg RA; Puttaiah R
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11203905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decontamination of dental unit water systems with hydrogen peroxide.
    Zanetti F; De Luca G; Tarlazzi P; Stampi S
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2003; 37(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 12904220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the ActiDes-Blue and CARELA HYDRO-DES technology for the sanitation of contaminated cooling water systems in dental units.
    Kramer A; Lemanski S; Demond K; Assadian O
    GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip; 2012; 7(1):Doc09. PubMed ID: 22558043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clearance of biofilms from dental unit waterlines through the use of hydroperoxide ion-phase transfer catalysts.
    Shepherd PA; Shojaei MA; Eleazer PD; Van Stewart A; Staat RH
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):755-61. PubMed ID: 11820043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of delayed microbial analysis of dental unit water line specimens.
    Palenik CJ; Burgess KH; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15973824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of microbial contamination in dental unit water systems using tetra-sodium EDTA.
    Percival RS; Devine DA; Nattress B; Kite P; Marsh PD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 107(4):1081-8. PubMed ID: 19486406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hygiene problems in dental practice with special attention to dental units].
    Borneff M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1986 Dec; 183(2-3):130-52. PubMed ID: 3107265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro modeling of dental water line contamination and decontamination.
    Spratt DA; Latif J; Montebugnoli LL; Wilson M
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 15183886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.