304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885424)
1. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthodontic radiographic procedures--how safe are they?
Buch B; Fensham R
SADJ; 2003 Feb; 58(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12705098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W; Luska G
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation protection of staff in 111In radionuclide therapy--is the lead apron shielding effective?
Lyra M; Charalambatou P; Sotiropoulos M; Diamantopoulos S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):272-6. PubMed ID: 21816731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The use of a thyroid collar for intraoral radiography].
Schmidt K; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Jun; 105(6):209-12. PubMed ID: 11928141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac catheterization: impact of face and neck shielding on new estimates of effective dose.
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 19901597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses.
Prins R; Dauer LT; Colosi DC; Quinn B; Kleiman NJ; Bohle GC; Holohan B; Al-Najjar A; Fernandez T; Bonvento M; Faber RD; Ching H; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21802322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The efficacy of lead shielding in patient dosage reduction in computed tomography].
Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Vogl T; Schedel H; Felix R
Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 8998318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The leaded apron revisited: does it reduce gonadal radiation dose in dental radiology?
Wood RE; Harris AM; van der Merwe EJ; Nortjé CJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 2047109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation protection to the eye and thyroid during diagnostic cerebral angiography: a phantom study.
Shortt CP; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 18811760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of a Commercial Lead Apron on Patient Skin Dose Delivered During Oral and Maxillofacial Examinations under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Schulze RKW; Sazgar M; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
Health Phys; 2017 Aug; 113(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28658058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of an optically stimulated dosimeter for dentomaxillofacial dosimetry.
Valiyaparambil JV; Mallya SM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):793-7. PubMed ID: 21983291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
