BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885615)

  • 1. Maintaining a pregnancy following loss of capacity.
    Peart NS; Campbell AV; Manara AR; Renowden SA; Stirrat GM
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 11885615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
    Procaccino JA
    Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posthumous reproduction.
    Robertson JA
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human rights and human life: an uneven fit.
    Patterson EG
    Tulane Law Rev; 1994 Jun; 68(6):1527-61. PubMed ID: 11656638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The doctor's dilemma: necessity and the legality of medical intervention.
    Wilson W; Smith K
    Med Law Int; 1995; 1(4):387-410. PubMed ID: 11660022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
    Peterson GW
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
    Burch TJ
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Therefore choose death?
    Appelbaum PS; Klein JI
    Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personhood: current legal views.
    Larson EJ
    Second Opin; 1990 Jul; 14():41-53. PubMed ID: 11650425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
    Horttor BJ
    N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advance directives and the personal identity problem.
    Buchanan A
    Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(4):277-302. PubMed ID: 11657368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
    Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Will society defend our right to live?
    Ackerman F; Silverman H; Cohen C; Meisel A
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law.
    Dresser R
    Ariz Law Rev; 1986; 28(3):373-405. PubMed ID: 11652552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
    Caspar R
    Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to death.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ruling by a court keeps fetus alive.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What role for surrogate decision makers?
    Hubbard H
    Origins; 1993 Feb; 22(34):576-9. PubMed ID: 11652129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.