These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11885737)
1. Influence of sample preparation, staining procedure and analysis conditions on bull sperm head morphometry using the morphology analyser integrated visual optical system. Boersma A; Rasshofer R; Stolla R Reprod Domest Anim; 2001 Oct; 36(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 11885737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. García-Herreros M; Aparicio IM; Barón FJ; García-Marín LJ; Gil MC Int J Androl; 2006 Oct; 29(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 16968497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. Davis RO; Gravance CG Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 7678821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Rijsselaere T; Van Soom A; Hoflack G; Maes D; de Kruif A Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1292-306. PubMed ID: 15325556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. Hidalgo M; Rodríguez I; Dorado J Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):996-1003. PubMed ID: 16620924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer-assisted image analysis. Gago C; Pérez-Sánchez F; Yeung CH; Tablado L; Cooper TG; Soler C Int J Androl; 1998 Jun; 21(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 9669201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two staining and evaluation methods used for computerized human sperm morphology evaluations. Coetzee K; Kruger TF; Vandendael A; de Villiers A; Lombard CJ Andrologia; 1997; 29(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 9197916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of measurements on human, rabbit, and bull sperm by computer-assisted sperm analysis when comparing individual fields and means of 12 fields. Farrell P; Trouern-Trend V; Foote RH; Douglas-Hamilton D Fertil Steril; 1995 Jul; 64(1):208-10. PubMed ID: 7789564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of different staining and washing procedures on the results of human sperm morphology evaluation by manual and computerised methods. Menkveld R; Lacquet FA; Kruger TF; Lombard CJ; Sanchez Sarmiento CA; de Villiers A Andrologia; 1997; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9049005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Coetzee K; Kruger TF; Lombard CJ Andrologia; 1999 May; 31(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 10363121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Descriptive analysis of sperm head morphometry in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): optimum sampling procedure and staining methods using Sperm-Class Analyzer ®. Esteso MC; Rodríguez E; Toledano-Díaz A; Castaño C; Pradiee J; López-Sebastián A; Santiago-Moreno J Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Apr; 155():42-9. PubMed ID: 25721563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cryopreservation on bull spermatozoa distribution in morphometrically distinct subpopulations. Rubio-Guillén J; González D; Garde JJ; Esteso MC; Fernández-Santos MR; Rodríguez-Gíl JE; Madrid-Bury N; Quintero-Moreno A Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Aug; 42(4):354-7. PubMed ID: 17635770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Farrell PB; Presicce GA; Brockett CC; Foote RH Theriogenology; 1998 Mar; 49(4):871-9. PubMed ID: 10732095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of epididymal semen quality using the Hamilton-Thorne analyser indicates variation between the two caudae epididymides of the same bull. Goovaerts IG; Hoflack GG; Van Soom A; Dewulf J; Nichi M; de Kruif A; Bols PE Theriogenology; 2006 Jul; 66(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 16387353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm head morphometry analysis of ejaculate and dismount stallion semen samples. Gravance CG; Champion Z; Liu IK; Casey PJ Anim Reprod Sci; 1997 May; 47(1-2):149-55. PubMed ID: 9233514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Replicate and technician variation associated with computer aided bull sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA). Gravance CG; Garner DL; Pitt C; Vishwanath R; Sax-Gravance SK; Casey PJ Int J Androl; 1999 Apr; 22(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 10194638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of sperm concentration in the ejaculate on morphological traits of bull spermatozoa. Kondracki S; Banaszewska D; Wysokńjska A; Iwanina M Folia Biol (Krakow); 2012; 60(1-2):85-91. PubMed ID: 22428313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation procedures for the Hamilton Thorne Integrated Visual Optical System sperm and cell analyzer. Douglas-Hamilton DH Qual Assur; 1995 Dec; 4(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 8890364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]