These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11886733)
1. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Wik L; Myklebust H; Auestad BH; Steen PA Resuscitation; 2002 Mar; 52(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 11886733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback. Wik L; Myklebust H; Auestad BH; Steen PA Resuscitation; 2005 Jul; 66(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15993726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The voice advisory manikin (VAM): an innovative approach to pediatric lay provider basic life support skill education. Sutton RM; Donoghue A; Myklebust H; Srikantan S; Byrne A; Priest M; Zoltani Z; Helfaer MA; Nadkarni V Resuscitation; 2007 Oct; 75(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 17459561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training. Wik L; Thowsen J; Steen PA Resuscitation; 2001 Aug; 50(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 11719144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of short individualised CPR self-learning sessions with automated assessment and feedback. Mpotos N; De Wever B; Cleymans N; Raemaekers J; Valcke M; Monsieurs KG Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1267-73. PubMed ID: 23511844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An audiovisual feedback device for compression depth, rate and complete chest recoil can improve the CPR performance of lay persons during self-training on a manikin. Krasteva V; Jekova I; Didon JP Physiol Meas; 2011 Jun; 32(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 21606561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voice advisory manikin versus instructor facilitated training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Isbye DL; Høiby P; Rasmussen MB; Sommer J; Lippert FK; Ringsted C; Rasmussen LS Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18687512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two instructional modalities for nursing student CPR skill acquisition. Kardong-Edgren SE; Oermann MH; Odom-Maryon T; Ha Y Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 20566391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulation intervention with manikin-based objective metrics improves CPR instructor chest compression performance skills without improvement in chest compression assessment skills. Al-Rasheed RS; Devine J; Dunbar-Viveiros JA; Jones MS; Dannecker M; Machan JT; Jay GD; Kobayashi L Simul Healthc; 2013 Aug; 8(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 23842118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training. Spooner BB; Fallaha JF; Kocierz L; Smith CM; Smith SC; Perkins GD Resuscitation; 2007 Jun; 73(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 17275158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between an instructor-led course and training using a voice advisory manikin in initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill acquisition. Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Park SW; Park SC Clin Exp Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 3(3):158-164. PubMed ID: 27752634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of a voice assist manikin (VAM) system on CPR quality among prehospital providers. Hostler D; Wang H; Parrish K; Platt TE; Guimond G Prehosp Emerg Care; 2005; 9(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 16036829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for medical students: voice advisory mannequin compared to guidance provided by an instructor. Díez N; Rodríguez-Díez MC; Nagore D; Fernández S; Ferrer M; Beunza JJ Simul Healthc; 2013 Aug; 8(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 23588058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital employees improve basic life support skills and confidence with a personal resuscitation manikin and a 24-min video instruction. Bjørshol CA; Lindner TW; Søreide E; Moen L; Sunde K Resuscitation; 2009 Aug; 80(8):898-902. PubMed ID: 19573973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Certified Basic Life Support Instructors Identify Improper Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Poorly: Instructor Assessments Versus Resuscitation Manikin Data. Hansen C; Bang C; Stærk M; Krogh K; Løfgren B Simul Healthc; 2019 Oct; 14(5):281-286. PubMed ID: 31490866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retraining basic life support skills using video, voice feedback or both: a randomised controlled trial. Mpotos N; Yde L; Calle P; Deschepper E; Valcke M; Peersman W; Herregods L; Monsieurs K Resuscitation; 2013 Jan; 84(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22922073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of CPR skills learned in a traditional AHA Heartsaver course versus 30-min video self-training: a controlled randomized study. Einspruch EL; Lynch B; Aufderheide TP; Nichol G; Becker L Resuscitation; 2007 Sep; 74(3):476-86. PubMed ID: 17442479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of 10-11-year-old schoolchildren using two different external chest compression to ventilation ratios. Hill K; Mohan C; Stevenson M; McCluskey D Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 18952356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer BLS: a randomised simulation study. Pavo N; Goliasch G; Nierscher FJ; Stumpf D; Haugk M; Breckwoldt J; Ruetzler K; Greif R; Fischer H Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 May; 24():70. PubMed ID: 27177424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]