BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11887362)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Chambers DW
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(4):2-4. PubMed ID: 11887362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Style over substance.
    Grace M
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):659. PubMed ID: 15592531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the gloss hide the dross?
    Lawrence A
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Mar; 19(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11922405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamics within peer review.
    Loevy H
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(5):374. PubMed ID: 19947129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review--it should mean something.
    Simonsen RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Aug; 27(8):509. PubMed ID: 9161253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using research for clinical decision-making: evaluating a research report.
    McCann AL; Schneiderman ED
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 May; 3(2):48-60. PubMed ID: 12167908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Rowan M; Huston P
    CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomedical research, data accumulation, and scientific etiquette.
    Habal MB
    J Craniofac Surg; 1995 May; 6(3):183. PubMed ID: 9020686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of correct clinical reporting.
    Albrektsson T; Zarb GA
    Ont Dent; 1999 May; 76(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 10635148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can peer review survive?
    Grace M
    Br Dent J; 2003 Apr; 194(7):349. PubMed ID: 12821894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It's just my opinion.
    Grace M
    Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(10):591. PubMed ID: 15153947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting published--improving the odds.
    Hupp J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):681-3. PubMed ID: 18417391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reality check.
    Conley JF
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1998 Nov; 26(11):807, 809. PubMed ID: 10029773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The qualitative research methodology.
    Saddler D
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18300830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An update on the Journal's progress.
    Brennan PA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 19643516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.