294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11887601)
1. Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study.
Celik C; Gemalmaz D
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11887601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The bonding effectiveness of five luting resin cements to the IPS Empress 2 all ceramic system.
Bookhan V; Essop AR; Du Preez IC
SADJ; 2005 Apr; 60(3):103, 105-7. PubMed ID: 15901014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal accuracy of press-ceramic veneers influenced by preparation design and fatigue.
Stappert CF; Ozden U; Att W; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18269129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
Guess PC; Stappert CF
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
Stappert CF; Ozden U; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16046967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study.
Turgut S; Bagis B
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 23522367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems before and after cementation.
Borges GA; Faria JS; Agarwal P; Spohr AM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Miranzi BA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 22616924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns.
Sulaiman F; Chai J; Jameson LM; Wozniak WT
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 9495168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers.
Dhawan P; Prakash H; Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 2003; 14(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 15328996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
