137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11887604)
1. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays.
Odman P
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11887604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3-year follow-up study of preformed beta-quartz glass-ceramic insert restorations.
Sjögren G; Hedlund SO; Jonsson C; Sandström A
Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11203902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
Molin MK; Karlsson SL
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 9855855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cerana--a new method for the restoration of teeth with prefabricated ceramic inlays.
Odman P; Nilsson E; Pietruszka K
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 May; 25(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 9639157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
Otto T; De Nisco S
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Frankenberger R
J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 19744761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight year results with direct ceramic restorations (Cerana).
Millar BJ; Robinson PB
Br Dent J; 2006 Oct; 201(8):515-520. PubMed ID: 17057677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.
Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D
J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays.
Posselt A; Kerschbaum T
Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year evaluation of two resin-retained ceramic systems: a retrospective study in a general practice setting.
Arnelund CF; Johansson A; Ericson M; Häger P; Fyrberg KA
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 15237876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
