These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11887604)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years.
    Schulz P; Johansson A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 14651236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers.
    Dhawan P; Prakash H; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2003; 14(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 15328996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite inlay FPDs.
    Monaco C; Ferrari M; Miceli GP; Scotti R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 12854799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An evaluation of the performance of cast gold bonded restorations in clinical practice, a retrospective study.
    Jamous I; Sidhu S; Walls A
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16919861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cerana--a direct ceramic inlay technique.
    Millar BJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Apr; 6(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 11819882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: a preliminary report.
    Bessing C; Lundqvist P
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 2068250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor).
    Stenberg R; Matsson L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8498166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays made with two systems: a one-year follow-up.
    Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Francischone CE; Lauris JR; de Lima NM
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 15779320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays.
    Tidehag P; Gunne J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 8595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Experimental studies on the reproducible precision of fit of ceramic inlays].
    Hahn R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):653-6. PubMed ID: 2269071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Long-term clinical performance of CEREC restorations and the variables affecting treatment success.
    Reiss B
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Jun; 22(6 Suppl):14-8. PubMed ID: 11913281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate.
    Fuzzi M; Rappelli G
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 11725688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.