These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11888019)

  • 1. High concentration of chloroquine in urine gives positive result with Amphetamine CEDIA reagent.
    Lora-Tamayo C; Tena T; Rodríguez A; Moreno D
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002; 26(1):58. PubMed ID: 11888019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Microgenics CEDIA heroin metabolite (6-AM) and the Roche Abuscreen ONLINE opiate immunoassays for the detection of heroin use in forensic urine samples.
    Holler JM; Bosy TZ; Klette KL; Wiegand R; Jemionek J; Jacobs A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 15516301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tetracaine from urethral ointment causes false positive amphetamine results by immunoassay.
    Wijngaard R; Parra-Robert M; Marés L; Escalante A; Salgado E; González-de-la-Presa B; To-Figueras J; Brunet M
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2021 Jun; 59(6):500-505. PubMed ID: 33112680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Reactivity of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine With DRI Amphetamine Immunoassay.
    Gomila I; Quesada L; López-Corominas V; Fernández J; Servera MÁ; Sahuquillo L; Dastis M; Torrents A; Barceló B
    Ther Drug Monit; 2017 Apr; 39(2):192-196. PubMed ID: 28207572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison and evaluation of DRI methamphetamine, DRI ecstasy, Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine, and a modified Abuscreen ONLINE amphetamine screening immunoassays for the detection of amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MTH), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in human urine.
    Stout PR; Klette KL; Wiegand R
    J Anal Toxicol; 2003; 27(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 12908938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False-positive amphetamine screen following a trazodone overdose.
    Roberge RJ; Luellen JR; Reed S
    J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 2001; 39(2):181-2. PubMed ID: 11407508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay.
    Liu L; Wheeler SE; Rymer JA; Lower D; Zona J; Peck Palmer OM; Tamama K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 438():307-8. PubMed ID: 25242739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False-positive amphetamine/ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (CEDIA) and ecstasy (MDMA/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) (DRI) test results with fenofibrate.
    Kaplan YC; Erol A; Karadaş B
    Ther Drug Monit; 2012 Oct; 34(5):493-5. PubMed ID: 22972534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening procedure for 21 amphetamine-related compounds in urine using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Battu C; Marquet P; Fauconnet AL; Lacassie E; Lachâtre G
    J Chromatogr Sci; 1998 Jan; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9443380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of an improved method for screening of amphetamines.
    Shindelman J; Mahal J; Hemphill G; Pizzo P; Coty WA
    J Anal Toxicol; 1999 Oct; 23(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 10517558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of EMIT II, CEDIA, and DPC RIA assays for the detection of lysergic acid diethylamide in forensic urine samples.
    Wiegand RF; Klette KL; Stout PR; Gehlhausen JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 12423010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analytical confirmation of error in false positive amphetamine immunoassays and results].
    Schütz H; Erdmann F; Magiera ES; Weiler G
    Arch Kriminol; 1998; 201(3-4):93-6. PubMed ID: 9582976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Desipramine and amantadine causing false-positive urine test for amphetamine.
    Merigian KS; Browning RG
    Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Dec; 22(12):1927-8. PubMed ID: 8239121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reagent lot-to-lot variability in sensitivity for amphetamine with the Syva Emit II Monoclonal Amphetamine/Methamphetamine assay.
    Singh J
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 9083839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low concentrations of methamphetamine detectable in urine in the presence of high concentrations of amphetamine.
    Jemionek JF; Addison J; Past MR
    J Anal Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 33(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 19371467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chirality of methamphetamine and amphetamine from workplace urine samples.
    Cooke BJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 1994; 18(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8127085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False positive results for amphetamine in urine of a patient with diabetes mellitus.
    Fucci N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):e60. PubMed ID: 23026178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitation of methamphetamine and amphetamine in urine by capillary GC/MS Part II. Derivatization with 4-carbethoxyhexafluorobutyryl chloride.
    Czarny RJ; Hornbeck CL
    J Anal Toxicol; 1989; 13(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 2615335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive predictive values of abused drug immunoassays on the Beckman Synchron in a veteran population.
    Dietzen DJ; Ecos K; Friedman D; Beason S
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 25(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 11327349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can tapentadol cause a false-positive urine drug screen result for amphetamine?
    Tang S; Mullins ME; Braun BM; Hock KG; Scott MG; Guarino AH; Brasington RD
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2012 Dec; 50(10):1174-5. PubMed ID: 23088194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.