152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11889898)
1. Section 1B: Rh flow cytometry. Coordinator's report. Rhesus index and antigen density: an analysis of the reproducibility of flow cytometric determination.
Flegel WA; Curin-Serbec V; Delamaire M; Donvito B; Ikeda H; Jørgensen J; Kumpel B; Le Pennec PY; Písacka M; Tani Y; Uchikawa M; Wendel S; Wagner FF
Transfus Clin Biol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 11889898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel weak D types 31 and 32: adsorption-elution-supported D antigen analysis and comparison to prevalent weak D types.
Körmöczi GF; Förstemann E; Gabriel C; Mayr WR; Schönitzer D; Gassner C
Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 16181207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Section 1A: Rh serology. Coordinator's report.
Scott M
Transfus Clin Biol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11889897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive analysis of DEL types: partial DEL individuals are prone to anti-D alloimmunization.
Körmöczi GF; Gassner C; Shao CP; Uchikawa M; Legler TJ
Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(10):1561-7. PubMed ID: 16181205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Some observations on D antigen expression of D-positive and 'weak D-positive' red cells as assessed by flow cytometry.
Nelson M; Barrow LA; Popp H; Gibson J
Vox Sang; 1995; 69(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 8585204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Section 1C: Assessment of the functional activity and IgG Fc receptor utilisation of 64 IgG Rh monoclonal antibodies. Coordinator's report.
Kumpel BM; Beliard R; Brossard Y; Edelman L; de Haas M; Jackson DJ; Kooyman P; Ligthart PC; Monchâtre E; Overbeeke MA; Puillandre P; de Romeuf C; Wilkes AM
Transfus Clin Biol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 11889899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes.
Wagner FF; Frohmajer A; Ladewig B; Eicher NI; Lonicer CB; Müller TH; Siegel MH; Flegel WA
Blood; 2000 Apr; 95(8):2699-708. PubMed ID: 10753853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of IgG anti-D bound to D-positive red cells infused into D-negative subjects after intramuscular injection of monoclonal anti-D.
Kumpel BM; Judson PA
Transfus Med; 1995 Jun; 5(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 7655572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coordinator's report on the flow cytometric analysis of the Rh antibodies.
Fletcher A; Bryant JA; Stavliotis M
Transfus Clin Biol; 1996; 3(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 9018799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Rh phenotype on the antigen density of C, c, and D: flow cytometric study using a frozen standard red cell.
Wagner FF
Transfusion; 1994 Aug; 34(8):671-6. PubMed ID: 8073482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Partial deletion of the D antigen in a family group. Determination of its antigenic density by flow cytometry].
Hernández T; León G; Sánchez P
Sangre (Barc); 1994 Apr; 39(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 7520193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Expression of RhD antigen on RBC of different RhD serotype by flow cytometry].
Zhou Y; Lü WB; Li J; Chen X; Wang NH; Fang J
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 16(6):1452-4. PubMed ID: 19099663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometric quantification of antigen D sites on red blood cells of partial D and weak D variants in India.
Kulkarni S; Mohanty D; Gupte S; Vasantha K; Joshi S
Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 16879157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weak D type 1.1 exemplifies another complexity in weak D genotyping.
Doescher A; Flegel WA; Petershofen EK; Bauerfeind U; Wagner FF
Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(10):1568-73. PubMed ID: 16181206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outliers in RhD membrane integration are explained by variant RH haplotypes.
Yu X; Wagner FF; Witter B; Flegel WA
Transfusion; 2006 Aug; 46(8):1343-51. PubMed ID: 16934070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three molecular structures cause rhesus D category VI phenotypes with distinct immunohematologic features.
Wagner FF; Gassner C; Muller TH; Schonitzer D; Schunter F; Flegel WA
Blood; 1998 Mar; 91(6):2157-68. PubMed ID: 9490704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak D types with different serologic techniques.
Denomme GA; Dake LR; Vilensky D; Ramyar L; Judd WJ
Transfusion; 2008 Mar; 48(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 18067505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rh flow cytometry: An updated methodology for D antigen density applied to weak D types 164 and 165.
Hutchison CJ; Srivastava K; Polin H; Bueno MU; Flegel WA
Transfusion; 2023 Nov; 63(11):2141-2151. PubMed ID: 37792462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Standardization of the quantitative flow cytometric test with anti-D antibodies for fetomaternal hemorrhage in RhD negative women].
Spychalska J; Uhrynowska M; Pyl H; Klimczak-Jajor E; Kopeć I; Peciakowska M; Gutowska R; Gawlak M; Słomska S; Dąbkowska S; Szczecina R; Dębska M; Brojer E
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Jul; 86(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 26376524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RHD epitope density profiles of RHD variant red cells analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flegel WA; Wagner FF
Transfus Clin Biol; 1996; 3(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 9018803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
