These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11890017)

  • 1. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers.
    Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Owen FJ; Watson DJ
    Dent Update; 2002; 29(1):10-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 11890017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
    Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.
    Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration of primary molars using a new "compomer" material.
    Swift EJ; Vann WF
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 7(8):25-30; quiz 32. PubMed ID: 9002898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: I. Conventional materials and early glass ionomers.
    Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Watson DJ; Owen FJ
    Dent Update; 2001 Dec; 28(10):486-91. PubMed ID: 11862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review.
    Hse KM; Leung SK; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10217014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Resin-modified glass-ionomers in dentistry].
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):448-51. PubMed ID: 11921988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of Adhesive Restorations for Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Clinical Trials.
    Santos AP; Moreira IK; Scarpelli AC; Pordeus IA; Paiva SM; Martins CC
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 38(5):370-378. PubMed ID: 28206891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
    Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compomers, reattachment method expand restoration capabilities.
    DeSchepper EJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1998-1999 Winter; 77(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 10530109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.